Filipp Fortunatov: An Underestimated Talent
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2023-21-1-5-16
Abstract
This article marks the 175 anniversary of the famous Russian linguist Filipp Fortunatov and looks at his major findings. It is pointed out that in certain respects the scholar has contributed a lot to the linguistic science of his time. While working in the sphere of comparative linguistics, F. Fortunatov was actively involved in the studies of the Baltic-Slavic languages. In his contemplation of the sociological aspect of language, he forestalled the appearance of psycholinguistics. Concurrently, the scholar based his judgments on the then popular neogrammarian movement and the German psychological school. While analyzing the phonic aspect of the word, F. Fortunatov also used the provisions that would nowadays be deemed psycholinguistic. His contribution to the development of the theory of syntax and pedagogical ideas is undeniable, too. F. Fortunatov obviously deserves credit for having founded the Moscow linguistic school that fostered a constellation of talented scholars. Moreover, F. Fortunatov’s morphological classification of world languages is recognized as a most accurate one by modern typology. This classification was elaborated long before the linguists of the 20th century came to similar findings. The above mentioned achievements by F. Fortunatov seem to be misappreciated by Russian linguists let alone the Western ones. Russian textbooks of typology favor the morphological classification put forward by W. von Humboldt, although, as it is argued in the article, F. Fortunatov’s classification presents typological diversity of world languages more profoundly and precisely. If W. von Humboldt distinguished four language types, F. Fortunatov did five. His classification, except for minor terminological differences, overlaps with the five world language types singled out by scholars in the 20th century, in particular by V. Skalička. All this goes to say that the breakthrough in world language typology made by F. Fortunatov has really been misappreciated by modern linguistics and pedagogy.
About the Author
A. D. Palkin
Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexei D. Palkin, Doctor of Philology, professor of the English Language Stylistics Chair
Moscow
References
1. Alpatov, V. M. History of linguistic studies. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskih kul’tur, 2005. 368 p. (in Russ.)
2. Bogdanova, L. I. Actantial grammar and aspects of teaching Russian. In: Vtorye Fortunatovskie chtenija v Karelii; sbornik dokladov natsionalnoj (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchnoj konferentsii (3–4 ijunja 2021 goda, g. Petrozavodsk). Petrozavodsk: Izdatelstvo PetrGU, 2022, pp. 84–86. (in Russ.)
3. Charykova, O. N., Sternin, I. A. (eds.). Introduction to linguistics. Voronezh: “Istoki”, 2016. 142 p. (in Russ.)
4. Fici, F. La ‘forme du mot’ dans la pensée linguistique russe. Cahiers Du Centre De Linguistique Et Des Sciences Du Langage, 2022, vol. 25, pp. 235–248.
5. Fortunatov, F. F. Selectas. V. 1. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe uchebno-pedagogicheskoe izdatel’stvo Ministerstva prosveshhenija RSFSR, 1956, 452 p. (in Russ.)
6. Fortunatov, F. F. Selectas. V. 2. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe uchebno-pedagogicheskoe izdatel’stvo Ministerstva prosveshhenija RSFSR, 1957, 472 p. (in Russ.)
7. Gerbart, I. F. Psychology. Moscow: Publishing house “Territorija budushhego”, 2007. 288 p. (Transl. from Germ. into Russ.)
8. Girutskii, A. A. Introduction to linguistics. Minsk: “TetraSistems”, 2003. 288 p. (in Russ.) Herbart, J. F. Psychologische Untersuchungen. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung, 1839. 286 S.
9. Ljapunov, B. M. From semasiological studies in the Russian language: “leisure”, etc. Izvestija Akademii Nauk. Otdelenie Literatury i Jazyka, 1946, vol. V, no. 1, pp. 63–68. (in Russ.)
10. Nemchenko, V. N. Introduction to linguistics. Moscow: Drofa, 2008. 704 p. (in Russ.)
11. Peshkovskii, A. M. Russian syntax in scientific interpretation. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1938. 452 p. (in Russ.)
12. Porzhezinskii, V. K. Digest of comparative phonetics of Old Indian, Greek, Latin and Old Slavic: Manual for Prof. V. Porzhezinskij’s lectures. Moscow: Tipo-lit. t-va I. N. Kushnerev i Co, 1912. 83 p. (in Russ.)
13. Reformatskii, A. A. Introduction to linguistics. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2006. 536 p.
14. Shahmatov, A. A. Digest of modern Russian literary language. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1941. 288 p. (in Russ.)
15. Shahmatov, A. A. Filipp Fedorovich Fortunatov. In memoriam. Izvestija Imperatorskoj Akademii Nauk. Series VI, 1914, vol. 8(14), pp. 967–976. (in Russ.)
16. Shajkevich, A. Ja. Introduction to linguistics. Moscow: Izdatel’skij centr “Akademija”, 2005. 400 p. (in Russ.)
17. Shherba, L. V. F. F. Fortunatov in the history of language science. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 1963, vol. 5, pp. 89–93. (in Russ.)
18. Skalička, V. On the issue of typology. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 1966, vol. 4, pp. 22–30. (in Russ.) Skalička, V. Typology and comparative linguistics. In: Novelties in Foreign Linguistics, Issue XXV. Contrastive linguistics: Translations. Ed. V. G. Gak. Moscow: Progress, 1989. P. 27–31. (in Russ.)
19. Steinthal, H. Philologie, Geschichte Und Psychologie In Ihren Gegenseitigen Beziehungen. Berlin: Dümmler, 1864. 76 S.
20. Tomson, A. I. On syntax and semasiology of Russian. Odessa: Econ. tip., 1903. 84 p. (in Russ.)
21. Urbanavičienė, J. Accentuation of Nominal Words in the Vilnius Speech: de Saussure and Fortunatov’s synchronic law. Taikomoji kalbotyra, 2014, vol. 6, pp. 1–32. (in Lith.)
22. Ushakov, D. N. Brief introduction into the science of language. Moscow – Petrograd: Gos. izd-vo, 1923. 144 p. (in Russ.)
23. Vendina, T. I. Introduction to linguistics. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola, 2001. 288 p. (in Russ.) von Humboldt, W. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaus und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Die Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1836. 534 S.
Review
For citations:
Palkin A.D. Filipp Fortunatov: An Underestimated Talent. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2023;21(1):5-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2023-21-1-5-16
Views:
376
Email this article 