English Political Neologisms: From Semantics to Pragmatics of Usage

The article is concerned with linguistic means of political discourse as one of the forms of communicative interaction in society. The general notion of discourse with respect to thematic, socio-psychological and functional approaches is considered, the notion of political discourse as a specific use of communication aimed at retention of political power is also analyzed. A supposition about the importance of person-centered approach in the process of interaction between public authority and members of the society within the media landscape is made, in particular, while using social networks, creating an illusion of intimacy and targeted communication of a politician with a member of potential electorate. Modern political communication is not so much based on topic-oriented language system as is determined by emotional stylistic format clearly seen in the choice of original linguistic means. In order to analyze linguistic material, a number of methods have been used: the method of componential analysis, contextual analysis and intent analysis in combination with personological approach to the estimation of politicians’ personalities and their professional activities, which made it possible to determine the specificity of cultural-situational functioning of neologisms in media. The analysis of political neologisms from the point of view of their semantics with the emphasis on evaluative and national-cultural components of connotative meaning as well as the linguopragmatic effect of their usage seems to be high on the agenda. The introduction of neologisms gives prominence and a certain competitive advantage to speakers thanks to creating an expressive effect and the consequent imprinting of neologisms in the linguocognitive worldview of recipients. Two groups of neologisms with explicitly (containing related semantic components of meaning) and implicitly (on the base of extralinguistic factors) expressed negative evaluation have been distinguished: socio-political neologisms and personological political neologisms. It is stated that political neologisms obtain stimulating and manipulative potential and can not only serve as triggers to social activity but can also be a means of manipulation with the purpose of reinforcing cognitive stereotypes. Personological slang neonominations are notable for significant stability of referential meaning, high frequency of usage due to simplicity of word form and easiness of memory retention since they often reflect common value orientations of ordinary carriers of mass consciousness.

1. Alexeyev, A. B. The Influence of Political Discourse on the Formation of the Language Personality of a Politician. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2021, vol. 19(4), pp. 151–166. (in Russ.)

2. Al-Majdawi, A. The Significance of Political Neologisms. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 2019.

3. Arnold, I. V. Lexicology of Modern English: tutorial, 2nd ed. Moscow, FLINTA, 2012. 376 p. (in Russ.)

4. Arnold, I. V. Stylistics of Modern English: tutorial, 14th ed. Moscow, FLINTA, 2021. 384 p. (in Russ.)

5. Bodoc, A. Linguistic Instruments Employed in Political Discourses. Manipulation Tools or Expressions of Human Universal Behaviour? Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov. Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies, 2018, vol. 11 (60), no. 2, pp. 49–70.

6. Collins, P. The Art of Speeches and Presentations. Padstow: TJ International Ltd., 2013. 211 p.

7. Golubtsov, S., Zelenskaya, V., Lominina, Z., Olomskaya, N., Uvarova, I., Bagova, I. The Main Methods of Entering Neologisms in Modern Advertising Discourse. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2019, vol. 374, pp. 117–123.

8. Hanaqtah, M. F. Translation of Political Neologisms Coined by Politicians; Issues and Strategies.

9. Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1. DOI 10.1080/23753234.2019.1664916 Joseph, J. E. Language and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. 176 p.

10. Karasik, V. I. Communicative Tonality. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2008, no. 10, pp. 99–109. (in Russ.)

11. Karasik, V. I. Language Circle: Person, Concepts, Discourse. Moscow, Gnozis, 2004. 392 p. (in Russ.)

12. Katermina, V. V. Political Neonomination in Mass Media Discourse. Political Linguistics, 2016, no. 4(58), pp. 27–33. (in Russ.)

13. Katermina, V. V., Vulfovich, B. G. Linguopragmatics of Users’ Commentaries in Political Internet Discourse: monograph. Krasnodar, KubSU, 2022. 170 p. (in Russ.)

14. Khabibullina, F. Ya., Ivanova, I. G. Functioning of Political Neologisms in International and Regional Mass Media Resources of Languages with Different Structures. The Social Sciences, 2016, no. 11(8), pp. 1699–1704.

15. Lacatus, C. Populism and President Trump’s Approach to Foreign Policy: an Analysis of Tweets and Rally Speeches [Online]. Politics, vol. 41(1), pp. 31–47. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0263395720935380 (accessed on: 30.05.2022).

16. Levshenko, Yu. I. Political Discourse: Analytical Review of Theoretical-Methodological Approaches. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences. Theory and Practice, 2012, no. 7(21), pp. 100–108. (in Russ.)

17. Malysheva, O. P., Ryabchenko, N. A., Uskov, S. V. Linguo-Discursive Analysis of Deliberative Practices in the Online Space: United Russia – Eighth Convocation State Duma Elections. Political Linguistics, 2022, no. 1(91), pp. 44–58. (in Russ.)

18. Miniar-Beloroutcheva, A. P. On Coining Political Neologisms. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Linguistics”, 2012, no. 25, pp. 32–37. (in Russ.)

19. Norman, B. Yu. Linguistic Pragmatics (a Case Study of Russian and Other Slavic Languages). Minsk, BSU, 2009. 183 p. (in Russ.)

20. Poiana, O., Stretea, A. “Brexitology”: a Story of Renegotiations, Referendums and “Bregrets”? Modelling the New Europe, 2018, no. 28, pp. 206–216.

21. Pavlova, N. D., Grebenshchikova, T. A. Intent-Analysis: Basis, Procedure and Experience of Use. Moscow, IP RAN, 2017. 151 p. (in Russ.)

22. Patyukova, R. V., Olomskaya, N. N. Media Discourse: Specificity of Formation of Sociocultural Communication in Media Landscape. Krasnodar, KubSU, 2021. 184 p. (in Russ.)

23. Ponton, D. M. Movements and Meanings: Towards an Integrated Approach to Political Discourse Analysis. Russian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 20(4), pp. 122–139.

24. Rosenthal, D. E. Modern Russian. Moscow, Iris-Press, 2002, 446 p. (in Russ.)

25. Ryabchenko, N. A., Katermina, V. V., Gnedash, A. A., Malysheva, O. P. Models and Practices of Political Content Management in the Online Space of Modern States in Post-Truth Era. Moscow, FLINTA, 2020. 340 p. (in Russ.)

26. Ryabchenko, N. A., Katermina, V. V., Malysheva, O. P. Political Content Management: New Linguistic Units and Social Practices. Church, Communication and Culture, 2019, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 305–322.

27. Shejgal, E. I. Semiotics of Political Discourse: monograph. Volgograd, Peremena, 2000. 368 p. (in Russ.)

28. Sukhanov, Yu. Yu. Political Discourse as Object of Linguistic Analysis. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 200–212. (in Russ.)

29. Wilson, J. Talking with the President: Pragmatics of Presidential Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. 274 p.