Sociolinguistic and Philosophical Discursive Aspects of B. Shaw’s Play ‘Pygmalion’
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2023-21-2-5-25
Abstract
The article dwells on linguo-social aspects of the early 20th century discourse, primarily as they are shown in B. Shaw’s play ‘Pygmalion’, written in 1912 and steeped in the atmosphere of the England of that time. The definition of the term ‘discourse’ is given in accordance with M. Foucault’s theory. It is pointed out that any discourse is inextricably linked with historical factors of its origination as well as the ideology and – in a broader sense – the worldview of people living in a concrete historical epoch. General scientific methods of observation, interpretation and induction have been used. Linguistic methods including linguo-pragmatic and linguo-stylistic approaches to discourse have also been applied. The method of critical discourse analysis makes it possible to emphasize the importance and dynamism of discursive linguo-social aspects. It has been found that the plot of the play is mainly built by the heroes’ exchange on a number of trivial problems. On the other hand, it has philosophical and in particular linguo-philosophical issues that make up the core of the book. As a result, the author sheds some light on his contemporaries’ attitude to language (languages) as well as to certain social groups distinguished – among other criteria – from the point of view of their members’ fluency in received/standard English. The hybrid character of B. Shaw’s literary discourse is highlighted. It has been shown that, within the analyzed discourse framework, everyday and mundane philosophical discursive practices play a prominent role. The latter can be conducive to the spread of (linguo-social) prejudices but at the same time it is not uncommon for them to serve as a basis for an alternative discourse.
About the Author
A. B. Alexeyev
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander B. Alexeyev, Candidate of Philology, senior teacher
chair of Professional Language Training
Moscow
References
1. Biktimerova D. A. Realization of feminist ideas in B. Shaw’s play ‘Pygmalion’. Student and Science. Humanity Cycle, 2020, pp. 1170–1175. (in Russ.)
2. Borbot’ko L. A. On the distinction of notions ‘belles-lettres’, ‘dramatic’, ‘dramaturgic’ and ‘theatrical’ discourse. Evolution and transformation of discourses: linguistic, philological and sociocultural aspects, 2014, pp. 359–365. (in Russ.)
3. Vaseneva N. V. On the question of characters’ peculiarities in B. Shaw’s play ‘Pygmalion’ // Science about human: humanties, 2010, no. 6, pp. 133–136. (in Russ.)
4. Grosheva A. V. Politainment discourse: to the definition of the concept. Sign: the problem field of media education, 2022, no. 4, pp. 31–37. (in Russ.)
5. Davydova K. A., Uarova O. V. Peculiarities of development of the cockney dialect in English. Kazan science, 2019, no. 5, pp. 130–132. (in Russ.)
6. Dorren G. Babylon Babel: Around the World in 20 Languages. Tr. from English. Мoscow: CoLibri, 2020. 448 p. (in Russ.)
7. Karimova D. Kh. Dramaturgic text and dramaturgic discourse: considering the correlation of the notions. VPGU News, 2012., no. 6(70), pp. 46–50. (in Russ.)
8. Karimova D. Kh. Units verbalizing corporality in discourse of drama (on the basis of American drama of the first half of the 20<sup>th</sup> century). Modern problems of science and education, 2015, no. 2-2, pp. 263–268. (in Russ.)
9. Kizima M. P. B. Shaw’s ‘Pygmalion’ and modern feminism. B. Shaw’s legacy and modernity (to the 150<sup>th</sup> anniversary since the English playwright’s birth), 2007, pp. 5–28. (in Russ.)
10. Knyazeva N. A. Means of indication of the literal character’s social status: axiological aspect (on the basis of B. Shaw’s play ‘Pygmalion’). Actual issues of philological sciences, 2015, pp. 16–20. (in Russ.)
11. Kondakova E. A., Principalova O. V. Discourse on the linguistic implementation of the principles of political correctness in German political linguistics. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2021, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 143–156. (in Russ.)
12. Krivonosov A. D. Public environment and public communication in the Internet era. Verkhnevolzhsky philological bulletin, 2016, no. 1, pp. 68–74. (in Russ.)
13. Mal’tseva I. A., Lebedinskaya V. G. Development of esports journalism in the context of formation of sports discourse: experience of analyzing the media text of the regional online publication. Vestnik of Chuvash state pedagogical university named after I.Ya. Yakovlev, 2022, no. 4(114), pp. 84–90. (in Russ.)
14. Mal’tseva I. A. Problems and prospects of development of esports journalism. International scientific journal, 2022, no 4(118), p. 19-22. (in Russ.)
15. Mihajlova O. R. The perspectives of ego-network analysis in the moral panic propagation studies on the interpersonal level. Monitoring of social opinion: economic and social changes, 2021, no. 2, pp. 28–47. (in Russ.)
16. Sazonova A. R. London’s vernacular in B. Shaw’s play ‘Pygmalion’ and peculiarities of its translation in Russian. Dialogue of cultures – dialogue about peace and on the behalf of peace, 2018, pp. 389–392. (in Russ.)
17. Trubeckova E. G. Medical discourse and / or morbual code: problems of terminology of modern literary criticism. News of the Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philology. Journalism, 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 186–191. (in Russ.)
18. Fefelov A. F. The discourse around Cancel Culture as an object of linguocultural and translation analysis: logic vs “logic”. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2022, no. 20(1), pp. 126–144. (in Russ.)
19. Florya A. V. An extraordinary bet: to the philosophical problems of B. Shaw’s comedy “Pygmalion”. Udmurt university Vestnik, 2018, vol. 28., no. 2., pp. 240–247. (in Russ.)
20. Chivil’gina E. V., Galichkina E. N. Lexico-semantic peculiarities of D. A. Medvedev’s personal websites (at the example of Twitter). A collection of scientific articles ‘Cognitive linguistics’, 2020, pp. 292–298. (in Russ.)
21. Boyd M. Participation and recontextualization in new media. Political discourse analysis and You Tube // From text to political positions: text analysis across disciplines. Ed. by M. B. Kaal, I. Maks, A. van Elfrinkhof. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2014. Pp. 245–268.
22. Culpeper J. Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 2011. 292 p.
23. Curzan A. Fixing English. Prescriptivism and language history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 197 p.
24. Eribon D. Returning to Reims. Tr. by M. Lucey. Paris: Semiotext(e), 2013. 255 p.
25. Fairclough N. Language and power. London: Longman Group, 1989. 259 p.
26. Foucault M. The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon, 1972. 254 p.
27. Foucault M. The history of sexuality: an introduction. Hammonsworth: Penguin, 1978. 168 p.
28. Gilyard K. True to the language game. African American discourse, cultural politics and pedagogics. New York: Routledge, 2011. 320 p.
29. McEnery T. Swearing in English. Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. London: Routledge, 2009. 276 p.
30. Morgan L. Ancient society or researches in the lines of human progress from savagery, through barbarism to civilization [Online]. URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/45950/pg45950-images.html (accessed on: 14.01.2022).
31. Rodionova T. V., Privalova I. V. Peculiarities of Medical Discourse in Professional and Non-Professional Settings. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philology. Journalism, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 39–43.
32. Tsesis A. Destructive messages: How hate speech paves the way for harmful social movements New York: New York University Press, 2002. 245 p.
33. Tylor E. B. Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art and custom. Vol. 1. London: John Murray, Albemable street [Online]. URL: https://books.google.ru/books/about/Primitive_Culture.html?id=AucLAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed on: 14.01.2022).
34. Watts R. J. Language myths and the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 338 p.
35. Shaw B. Pygmalion (a book for reading in English). Moscow: GLOSSA-PRESS, 2022. 224 p.
Review
For citations:
Alexeyev A.B. Sociolinguistic and Philosophical Discursive Aspects of B. Shaw’s Play ‘Pygmalion’. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2023;21(2):5-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2023-21-2-5-25
Views:
204
Email this article 