Actualization of the Future Meaning in English Literary Discourse
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2023-21-3-17-30
Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of linguistic means that serve to express the future meaning in English. The material for the study was the direct speech of a novel written by a British author, from which 1,695 examples containing predicative grammatical and lexico-grammatical units with the future meaning were extracted by continuous sampling. The study of the extracted language units was carried out using componential, distributive, contextual and quantitative analyses. The results of the study revealed a significant repertoire of linguistic means, expressing the future meaning with varying degrees of discreteness. Among the grammatical forms of the indicative mood, Future Indefinite and Present Indefinite were the most frequent; among the forms of the subjunctive mood, the form would + infinitive was in the lead. The imperative mood showed a very high frequency, being the most common grammatical means in the contexts of the future meaning. Of the lexico-grammatical means (represented by biverbal constructions), be going to + infinitive and can + infinitive were quite frequent. The Continuous and Perfect forms turned out to be much less common. It was also found that when used in contexts of the future meaning, the grammatical Continuous forms partially lose the semantics of duration, and the Perfect forms partially lose the semantics of completeness, which leads to a certain neutralization of their aspectual characteristics. Grammatical forms with the primary future meaning tended to be used as absolute tenses, while forms with the secondary future meaning — such as Present Indefinite, Present Perfect, Past Subjunctive — tended to express relative temporal semantics in dependent predication.
About the Author
E. V. BodnarukRussian Federation
Bodnaruk Elena Vladimirovna, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of German and French Philology
Arkhangelsk
References
1. Barkhudarov, L. S. Essays on the morphology of modern English. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1975. 156 p. (in Russ.)
2. Birenbaum, Ya. G. On the future form in the grammatical tense category of the English verb. Philological sciences. 1981. no 1. pp. 50–59. (in Russ.)
3. Bodnaruk, E. V. Modal verbs in the modern German language: systematization of the meanings. Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanitarian sciences. 2019. no. 1 (817). pp. 66–79. (in Russ.)
4. Bodnaruk, E. V. Semantics and pragmatics of the imperative in the modern German language // Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2018. Vol.16. no 3. pp. 67–76. (in Russ.)
5. Vorontsova, G. N. Essays on English Grammar. Moscow: Izd-vo literatury na inostrannyh yazykah, 1960. 399 p. (in Russ.)
6. Gurevich, V. V. Theoretical grammar of the English language. Comparative typology of English and Russian languages. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2017. 168 p. (in Russ.)
7. Ivanova, I. P. Aspect and tense in modern English. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1961. 200 p. (in Russ.)
8. Ivanova, I. P., Chahoyan, L. P. History of the English language. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1976.319 p. (in Russ.)
9. Ipatova, L. V. Semantic-grammatical connection of analytical means expressing the concepts of modality and future in English, French and Russian: Comparative analysis. Moscow. Cand. of Sс. Thesis. 2003. (in Russ.)
10. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. A University Grammar of English. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1982. 391 p.
11. Ripinskaya, L. V. On the question of ways expressing future action in English and Russian. Comparative analysis of lexical and grammatical units (categories) in Russian and German languages. Vologda: Izd-vo VGPI, 1986. pp. 97–105. (in Russ.)
12. Selezneva, O. N. Differentiation of means expressing the future meaning in modern English. Tver’. Cand. of Sс. Thesis. 2015. (in Russ.)
13. Sinagatullin, I. M. On expressing the future meaning in English and French. Philological sciences. 1991 no 2. pp. 69–78. (in Russ.)
14. Smirnitskaya, O. A. The evolution of the aspect-temporal system in the Germanic languages. Historical and typological morphology of the Germanic languages. The category of the verb. Moscow: Nauka, 1977. pp. 5–126. (in Russ.)
15. Smirnitsky,A. I. Morphology of the English language. Moscow: Izd-vo lit. na inostrannyh yazykah, 1959. 440 p. (in Russ.)
16. Khomutova, T. N. Modality and Mood in Modern English. Bulletin of South Ural State University.2008. no 1. pp. 19–23. (in Russ.)
17. Chuzhkova, O. Yu. Semantics of the future in Russian, English and Spanish: the interaction of temporality, aspectuality and modality. Sankt-Petersburg. Cand. of Sс. Thesis. 2018. (in Russ.)
18. Eastwood, J. Oxford Practice Grammar. Oxford University Press, 1999.
19. Foley, M., Hall, D. Advanced Learners` Grammar. Longman, 2003.
20. Hewings, M. Advanced Grammar in Use. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
21. Swan, M. Practical English Usage. Oxford University Press, 2016.
Review
For citations:
Bodnaruk E.V. Actualization of the Future Meaning in English Literary Discourse. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2023;21(3):17-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2023-21-3-17-30