“Geisha”, “Bunad”, “Gennever”: Exoticisms as Representatives of Geocultural Images in Tourist Discourse
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2025-23-1-33-45
Abstract
This article deals with the issue of lexical explication of geocultural territory images in tourist discourse. As a linguistic tool for creating authentic images of spaces in “other cultures”, the author considers exotic lexemes functioning in the relatively new magazine “Russian Traveler” as a written alternative of tourist discourse. By continuous sampling of the issues for the period 2023–2024 a selection of 238 exotic words was made. These words were interpreted with the help of lexicographic and ethnographic sources as well as contextual analysis. In the process of systematising the linguistic material, 12 thematic groups of exoticisms with different frequency were identified: “Natural geographical objects”, “Food and drinks”, “Mythology”, “Plant world”, etc. These groups describe basic fragments of the ethnic world view. The use of various thematic groups of exoticisms-appellatives as well as simultaneous functioning of realonyms and mythonyms, among which there are theonyms, hydronyms, anthroponyms, demononyms, toponyms, and other semantic subgroups of the above lexicon, makes it possible to create geocultural images of territories at the verbal level of the analysed texts in conjunction with their physical and geographical, sociocultural, traditional and domestic, ethnic, and other components. In general, exotic vocabulary in tourist discourse actualises readers’ background knowledge about “other” countries, regions, towns and cities, explicates ritual meanings, supports ethnostereotypes, thus contributing to the promotion of a tourist product.
About the Author
O. A. Selemeneva
Bunin Yelets State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Selemeneva, Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor
Scopus Author ID 57204429956
WoS Researcher ID B-6408-2018
RSCI Author ID 513229
Yelets
References
1. Dyachkov M. V., Leontiev A. A., Torsueva E. I. Yazyk tok-pisin (neomelaneziiskii) [The language of tok-pisin (Neomelanesian)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1981, 73 p. (in Russ.)
2. Filatova N. V. Turisticheskii diskurs v ryadu smezhnykh diskursov: gibridizatsiya ili polifoniya? [Tourism discourse among adjoining discorses: hybridization or polyphony]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Ser. Lingvistika [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University], 2012, no. 3, pp. 41–46. (in Russ.)
3. Foks K. Nablyudaya za anglichanami [Watching the British]. Moscow, RIPOL klassik Publ., 2008, 512 p. (in Russ.)
4. Golomidova M. V. Nazvaniya zolotykh priiskov Urala kak chast’ kul’turnogo kapitala territorii: lingvokul’turologicheskii aspekt [Naming of the goldfields of the Urals as part of the territory’s cultural capital: lingual and culturological aspect]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova [Bulletin of the Kostroma State University], 2015, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 101–104. (in Russ.)
5. Golomidova M. V. Ekaterinburg – Sverdlovsk – Ekaterinburg: obraz goroda v dinamike toponimicheskogo teksta [Ekaterinburg – Sverdlovsk – Ekaterinburg: the city image in the dynamics of a toponymic text]. Slovo.ru: baltiiskii aktsent [Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent], 2023, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29–53. DOI 10.5922/2225-5346-2023-1-2. (in Russ.)
6. Ibragimova Z. B. Urbech – traditsionnyi dagestanskii produkt pitaniya [Urbech is a traditional Dagestan food product]. ACTA HISTORICA: trudy po istorii, arkheologii, etnografii i obshchestvoznaniyu [Acta Historica: the Writings on the History, Archeology, Ethnography and Social Studies], 2018, no. 1, pp. 34–37. (in Russ.)
7. Katermina V. V. Novye tendentsii v turisticheskom diskurse (na materiale angliiskikh neologizmov) [The new tendencies in the tourist discourse (based on the English neologisms)]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki [Izvestia. Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University. Philological sciences], 2023, no. 2 (2), pp. 95–99. (in Russ.)
8. Kiss I. The persuasive discourse function in the language of tourism. Argumentum, 2018, vol. 14, pp. 150–162.
9. Krivoshchapova Yu. A. Regional’nye simvoly Russkogo Severa: na materiale ustoichivykh slovosochetanii s toponimicheskim komponentom [Regional symbols of Russian North: on material of collocations with toponymic component]. Nauchnyi dialog [Scientific Dialogue], 2017, no. 11, pp. 93–105. DOI 10.24224/2227-1295-2017-11-93-105. (in Russ.)
10. Krivoshchapova Yu. A. Imena kamnei kak lingvokul’turnyi simvol Urala [Stone names: a linguocultural symbol of the Urals]. Voprosy onomastiki [Problems of Onomastics], 2020, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 241–262. DOI 10.15826/vopr_onom.2020.17.3.042. (in Russ.)
11. Krysin L. P. Zaimstvovannye slova kak znaki inoi kul’tury [Borrowed words as signs of a different culture]. Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian Language at School], 2007, no. 4, pp. 83–87. (in Russ.)
12. Kupina N. A. Ot goroda-zavoda k sovremennomu peredovomu gorodu: stilisticheskie primety i tsennostnye orientiry gazety “Vechernii Pervoural’sk” [From the town-plant to the modern progressive city: stylistic marks and value reference points of the newspaper “Vecherniy Pervouralsk”]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki, kul’tury [Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal], 2016, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 13–25. (in Russ.)
13. Luchinskaya S. Yu. Zhurnaly-travelogi v usloviyakh globalizatsii media: Avtoref. dis. …kand. filol. nauk [Travelogue magazines in the context of the globalization of media. Abstract of Thesis Cand. Filol. Sci.]. Krasnodar, 2009, 23 p. (in Russ.)
14. Meluzzi C., Balsamo S. The language of food and wine tourism on the web. In Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 2021, no. 11(2), pp. 1–11. DOI 10.30935/ojcmt/10821.
15. URL:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350614925_The_Language_of_Food_and_Wine_Tourism_on_the_Web (accessed 10.02.2024).
16. Mityagina V. A., Novikova E. Yu., Charfaoui E., Opalkova J. Linguistic brand management of tourist destination. X Linguae Journal, 2018, vol. 11, iss. 3, pp. 541–556. DOI 10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.44.
17. Raevskaya M. M., Kiseleva L. N. Ispanskaya gastronomicheskaya traditsiya kak element sotsiokul’turnoi identichnosti [The Spanish gastronomic tradition as an element of socio-cultural identity]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Ser. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication], 2015, no. 2, pp. 77–87. (in Russ.)
18. Salim M. A. M., Mat Som A. P. Shaping Tourist Destinations Through Language and Visual Elements on Tourism Websites A Tourism Discourse Perspective. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2018, no. 7, pp. 364–369. DOI 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.34.26874.
19. Shenkao G. Kh. Imya kak sotsiokul’turnyi fenomen: Avtoref. dis. … dok. filos. nauk [Name as sociocultural phenomenon. Abstract of Thesis Doc. Philos. Sci.]. Cherkessk, 2002, 35 p. (in Russ.) Thurlow C., Jaworski A. Tourism discourse: Languages and banal globalization. Applied Linguistics Review, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 285–312. DOI 10.1515/9783110239331.285.
20. Varfolomeeva Yu. N. (2021). Imidzhevaya i navigatsionnaya funktsii tekstov gorodskoi sredy (na materiale ergourbonimov g. Ulan-Ude) [Image-Building and navigational functions of urban environment texts (by the material of Ulan-Ude ergourbonyms)]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory & Practice], 2021, vol. 14, iss. 12, pp. 3758–3763. DOI 10.30853/phil20210613. (in Russ.)
21. Zamyatin D. N. Ponyatie geokul’tury : obraz i ego interpretatsiya [Geographical culture : its image and interpretations]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal [Sociological Journal], 2002, no. 2, pp. 5–12. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Selemeneva O.A. “Geisha”, “Bunad”, “Gennever”: Exoticisms as Representatives of Geocultural Images in Tourist Discourse. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2025;23(1):33-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2025-23-1-33-45
Views:
8
Email this article 