Multiclausal Causal Constructions in Slovak
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2025-23-1-110-123
Abstract
The article proposes a typological description of the most common causal conjunctions (keďže, lebo and pretože) in Slovak in terms of coordination vs subordination meanings. The research is based on the Slovak National Corpus and grammatical descriptions, as well as on elicitation from a native speaker of Slovak through a questionnaire designed to identify relevant typological parameters. The parameters under study include the position of the causal clause relative to the consequence clause, as well as its propensity to occur with focus particles and under negation, to introduce answers to why-questions and occur on different semantic levels (content, epistemic and speech act levels in Eve Sweeter’s terms). Particular attention is paid to the latter, less studied, set of parameters. These parameters are often related to co- ordination and subordination properties, with coordinability regarded as a multi-parameter term (cf. a similar approach to transitivity by P. Hopper and S. Thompson or the differentiation of clitics from affixes by A. Zwicky and G. Pullum). Each of the three causal conjunctions under consideration proves to combine coordination and subordination features. Lebo as “the most coordinative” conjunction demonstrates only one subordination feature, an ability to introduce answers to why-questions (probably due to its origin from discourse markers used in coordinate constructions), while keďže proves to possess the highest proportion of subordination features. Moreover, keďže behaves heterogeneously with regard to speech act constructions where it can occur in imperative sentences, but not in interrogative ones. The conjunction pretože behaves as coordinate in semantic terms and as subordinate in terms of focusability. All the three conjunctions tend to function as coordinate in semantic terms while displaying varying behavior in the syntactic domain as regards the degree of focusability and the position of the causal clause.
Further research is required to describe typological properties of less common Slovak conjunctions.
About the Author
N. M. ZaikaRussian Federation
Natalia M. Zaika, PhD, Lead Researcher, Head of the Laboratory of Linguistic Typology
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Belyaev O. Cause in Russian and the formal typology of coordination and subordination. Donvm Semanticvm. Opera lingvistica et logica in honorem Barbarae Partee a discipvlis amicisqve Rossicis oblata. Arkad’ev P., Kapitonov I., Lander Ju., Rahilina E., Tatevosov S. (eds.) Moscow, Jazyki slavjanskih kul’tur, 2015, pp. 36–67.
2. Colson J. Bonnes raisons et causes douteuses: les propositions de cause en anglais et en français. Palimpsestes, 1993, vol. 7, pp. 55–71.
3. Diessel Н. The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: A typological study. Languag, 2001, vol. 3(77), pp. 433–455.
4. Dvonč L., Horák G., Miko F., Mistrík J., Oravec J., Ružička J., Urbančok M. Morfológia slovenského jazyka. Bratislava, Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied., 1966.
5. Gahér F. O vetných spojkách: logika verzus lingvistika. Jazykovedný časopis, 2001, № 52 (1), pp. 23–37.
6. Gаlán Rodríguez C. Las oraciones causales: propuesta de clasificación. Anuario de estudios filolо́gicos, 1995, vol. XVIII, pp. 125–158.
7. Guseva E. R. Dialect new growths as result of interlingual interference: the conjugations in dialects of Russian North. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Language, Individual & Society, 2012, vol. 6, part 2, pp. 4–15.
8. Frey W. Types of German causal clauses and their syntactic-semantic layers. Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses. Synchronic and Diachronic Insights. Jędrzejowski L., Fleczoreck C. (eds.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2023, pp. 51–100.
9. Haspelmath M. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica, 2011, vol. 45(1), pp. 31–80.
10. Hopper P. J, Thompson S. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language, 1980, vol. 56, no. 2. (Jun.), pp. 251–299.
11. Jędrzejowski L., Fleczoreck C. Outline of the volume. Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses. Synchronic and Diachronic Insights. Jędrzejowski L., Fleczoreck C. (eds.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2023a, pp. 1–12.
12. Jędrzejowski L., Fleczoreck C. Adverbial clauses and their variation. The case of causal clauses in German. Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses. Synchronic and Diachronic Insights. Jędrzejowski L., Fleczoreck C. (eds.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2023б, pp. 15–48.
13. Kesselová J. Korpusová sonda do operátorov príčinného vzťahu v slovenčine. Suchasnі tendencії slavіstiki.Uzhgorod: Vid-vo Oleksandri Garkushі, 2013, pp. 41–53.
14. Mel’čuk I. А. A course of Russian Morphology. Vol. 1, Moscow – Vienna: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury, Venskij slavisticheskij al’manah, Moscow, Progress, 1997. (In Russ.)
15. Pekelis O. On the oppositions that underlie the distinctions displayed by Russian causal clauses. Linguistics, 2022, vol. 60(5), pp. 1399–1449.
16. Scheffler Т. Syntax and semantics of causal denn in German. Proc. of the Fifteen Amsterdam Colloquium. Dekker P., Franke M. (eds.). Amsterdam: ILLC/Department of Philosophy, 2005, pp. 215–220.
17. Scheffler Т. Two-dimensional semantics: Clausal adjuncts and complements. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013.
18. SNK – Slovenský národný korpus (https://bonito.korpus.sk). (accessed on 10.04.2024)
19. Sweetser E. From etymology to pragmatics: The mind-body metaphor in semantic structure and semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
20. Zaika N. M. Polypredicative reason constructions in the world’s languages: Typological parameters. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 2019, № 4, pp. 7–32. (in Russ.)
21. Zaika N. M. Clausal Causal Markers in the Languages of Europe: A Database. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7434757. (accessed on 10.04.2024)
22. Žigo P. Vedl’ajšie vety príciny a vedl’ajšie vety účelu v slovenských nárečiach. Hrvatski Dijalektolološki zbornik, 2003, vol. 12, pp. 181–188.
23. Zwicky A, Pullum G. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English N’T. Language, 1983, vol. 59 (3), pp. 502–513.
Review
For citations:
Zaika N.M. Multiclausal Causal Constructions in Slovak. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2025;23(1):110-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2025-23-1-110-123