Semantic Classification of Russian Alternative Place-Name Etymologies from Trediakovsky’s Three Discourses on Three Most Important Russian Antiquities
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2021-19-1-81-91
Abstract
The research addresses the etymologies of 82 toponyms proposed by the Russian scholar V. Trediakovsky in the mid-1700s book Three Discourses on Three Most Important Russian Antiquities compared with 148 etymologies of the toponyms from The Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language by M. Vasmer, where the etymologies had been identified under the modern etymological approach. The article argues that the alternative etymologies proposed by Trediakovsky and the toponymic etymologies having been established under linguistic principles possess similarities in terms of general semantic features. Identifying the semantic features of toponyms from the two selections required the classification based on etymological and semantic features, with the principal division into natural and cultural place-names. The research showed that 5 out of 7 semantic features: hydronym, choronym, people’s activity, ethnonym, and type of settlement, corresponded in both selections. The alternative etymologies from the discourses revealed more semantic features related to the climate and soil. The semantic features of flora and fauna, which are part of modern semantic classifications, were found in rare cases in both toponymicons. The research showed that although generally Trediakovsky’s etymologies seemed to contradict the existing linguistic principles, the semantic features remained comparable with those of the place-name etymologies that were compiled at the later stages of scientific thought.
About the Author
A. V. Kalashnikov
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Basik, S. N. General Toponymics. A Manual of the Students of the Faculties of Geography. Minsk, BGU, 2006, 197 p. (in Russ.)
2. Dalberg, V. So-called Folk-etymological Reshaping of Place-names. In: Dalberg, V. Name and Place. Ten Essays on the Dynamics of Place-names. Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, 2008, p. 80-93.
3. Eco, U. The Search for the Perfect Language (The Making of Europe). Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 1995, 385 p.
4. Entwistle, W. S., Morison, W. A. Russian and the Slavonic Languages. London, Faber and Faber Limited, 1949, 407 p.
5. Hough, C. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming. Oxford, OUP, 2016, 771 p.
6. Klubkov, P. A. The Etymologies of Trediakovsky as a Fact of Historical Linguistics. Humanitāro zinātŋu vēstnesis Daugavpils universitāte, 2002, no. 2, p. 58-68. (in Russ.)
7. Kuhn, J. Rural Names. In: Hough, C. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming. Oxford, OUP, 2016, p. 135-143.
8. Lomonosov, M. V. The Notes on the Dissertation of G.-F. Miller “The Origin of the Name and the People of Russia”. In: Lomonosov, M. V. The Complete Works. Moscow, Leningrad, AS USSR Publ., 1952, vo. 6: The Works on Russian History, Social and Economic Issues and Geography, p. 17-80. (in Russ.)
9. Lyatsky, E. A. Trediakovsky. In: Brochaus, F. A., Efron, I. A. (eds.) Encyclopedic Dictionary, 33 A, Tombigbi - Quinisext Council. St. Petersburg, Brochaus-Efron, 1901, p. 750-753. (in Russ.)
10. Maltseva, T. V. On the Origin of the Russian People and Russian Language: Trediakovsky, Lomonosov, Sumarokov. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2015, no. 3, p. 299-307. (in Russ.)
11. Maltseva, T. V. The Works on History Concerning the ‘Most Important Russian Antiquities’: Trediakovsky v Academics Supporting Normanism. Art Logos, 2019, no. 1, p. 120-126. (in Russ.)
12. Nadezhdin, N. I. An Essay on the Historical Geography of the Russian World. Biblioteka dlya chteniya, 1837, vol. 22, p. 27-79. (in Russ.)
13. Nosovsky, G. V., Fomenko, A. T. The Old Maps of the Great Russian Empire, Ptolemy and Ortelius in the Light of the New Chronology. Moscow, Astrel’, AST, 2010, 685 p. (in Russ.)
14. Rastyagaev, A. V., Slozhenikina, Yu. V. The Genesis of Cultural and Political Mythology: Trediakovsky (1757), Lomonosov (1758), Sumarokov (1759) on the Origin of the Russian Nation and Russian Language. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 2016, no. 1 (5), p. 36-37. (in Russ.)
15. Reformatsky, A. A. Introducing Linguistics. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 1996, 536 p. (in Russ.)
16. Reyfman, I. Vasilii Trediakovsky: The Fool of the “New” Russian Literature. Stanford, Stanford Uni. Press, 1990, 316 p.
17. Schlözer, A. L. Nestor. Russian Manuscripts in the Old Slavic Language. St. Petersburg, Imperatorskaya tipografiya, 1809. (in Russ.)
18. Schoettgenius, Ch. De Ruthenorum originibus. Sectio III. In: Schoettgenius, Ch. De Originibus Russicis Dissertationes Septem. Dresdae et Lipsiae, Literis Harpeterianis, 1730, n. p. Soloviev, S. M. Russian Historiographers of the 18th Century. In: Soloviev, S. M. History of Russia since the Most Ancient Times. St. Petersburg, Obshchestvennaya pol’za, 1901, p. 1317-1388. (in Russ.)
19. Starchevsky, A. V. Trediakovskiy. In: The Essay on the Russian History before Karamzin, St. Petersburg, K. Zhernakov, 1845, p. 140-141. (in Russ.)
20. Taszycki, W. Slowianskie nazwy niejscowe (Ustalenie podzialu). Krakow, Polski Akademia Umiejetnosci, 1946, 64 p.
21. Tatishchev, V. N. By the Author Theophilus Siegfried Bayer De Varagis. In: Tatishchev, V. N. Complete Works. In 8 vols. Moscow, Ladomir, 1994, vol. 1: Russian History, pt. 1, p. 292-310. (in Russ.)
22. Tent, J., Blair, D. Motivations for Naming a Toponymic Typology. ANPS Technical paper, 2009, vol. 2, p. 1-26.
23. Trediakovsky, V. K. Three Discourses on Three Most Important Russian Antiquities, namely: 1. On the Primacy of the Slavyansky Language to Teutonic. 2. On the Origins of the Rus’ People. 3. On the Varangians as Slavic Russian People, their Title, Genesis and Language. In: Works. In 3 vols. St. Petersburg, Imperatorskaya Akademiya nauk, 1849, p. 319-540. (in Russ.)
24. Trediakovsky, V. K. Three Discourses on Three Most Important Russian Antiquities. Abriged ed. by V. N. Vasilev. Moscow, Belye al'vy, 2013, 216 p. (in Russ.)
25. Vasmer, M. Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language. In Four Volumes. Volume 1 (A-D). Moscow, Progress, 1986. 576 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kalashnikov A.V. Semantic Classification of Russian Alternative Place-Name Etymologies from Trediakovsky’s Three Discourses on Three Most Important Russian Antiquities. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2021;19(1):81-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2021-19-1-81-91
Views:
408
Email this article 