Frame, Gestalt and Image: Equivalence or Contiguity of Categorization?
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-2-29-40
Abstract
The study deals with making a distinction between the terms “concept” and “notion”, on the one hand, “frame”, “gestalt” and “image”, on the other. The survey shows that the researchers are not unanimous in their opinion regarding both the typology of cognitive structures and their content. Relevant classifications indicate clearly that frame, gestalt and image are most regular categories, so, understanding their content, apart from their relationship to each other with-in the framework of modern linguistics, is of particular interest to us. In the study, these concepts are considered in the following ways: a relevant scientific source survey, term definitions, key features, illustrations, and comparative research to distinguish between the equivalence, proximity, and contiguity degrees of the characteristics revealed. Based on such a systemic analysis, it has been found that gestalt, image and frame are categories of the external world conceptualization distinguished on the basis of their structural, functional and semantic features. As a result, it concludes, the categories “frame”, “gestalt” and “image” might be considered as contiguous concepts.
About the Authors
Zhiqiang Wang
Banzarov Buryat State University; Hebei North University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Wang Zhiqiang, PhD Student
Ulan-Ude
Zhangjiakou
P. P. Dashinimaeva
Banzarov Buryat State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Polina P. Dashinimaeva, Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor
Ulan-Ude
References
1. Akimtseva, Yu. V. Characteristic features of domestic and foreign approaches to the study of con-ceptual metaphor. Bulletin of VSU. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2017, no. 4, pp. 193–195. (in Russ.)
2. Askoldov, S. A. Russian literature: from the theory of literature to the structure of the text: Anthol-ogy. Institute of Peoples of Russia and others; ed. by V. P. Neroznak. Moscow, Academia, 1997, 317 p. (in Russ.)
3. Babushkin, A. P. Types of concepts in the lexico-phraseological semantics of language. Voronezh, Voronezh State Uni. Press, 1996, 103 p. (in Russ.)
4. Boldyrev, N. N. Cognitive semantics: (A course of lectures in English philology): Proc. manual for university students studying in the specialty “Foreign Philology”. Tambov, Tambov State Uni. Press, 2002, 122 p. (in Russ.)
5. Cherneiko, L. O. Linguistic and philosophical analysis of an abstract name. Moscow, 1997. 319 p. (in Russ.)
6. Dijk, T. A. van. Language. Cognition. Communication. Trans. from English. Comp. by V. V. Pet- rova; ed. by V. I. Gerasimov. Moscow, Progress, 1989, 312 p. (in Russ.)
7. Fillmore, Ch. J., Atkins, B. T. S. Towards a Frame-based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors. In: Lehrer A., Kittay E. F. (eds.). Frames, Fields and Contrasts. New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992, pp. 75–102.
8. Golovanova, E. I. Image, concept, gestalt as formats of professional knowledge. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 2014, no. 6 (335), pp. 122–125. (in Russ.)
9. Gubin, N. Glossary of psychological terms. Moscow, Nauka, 1999, 302 p. (in Russ.)
10. Lakoff, G. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don’t. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1996, 421 p.
11. Leontiev, A. N. Image of the world. Leontiev, A. N. Selected psychological works: In 2 vols. Ed. by V. V. Davydova et al. Moscow, Pedagogy, 1983, vol. 2, pp. 251–261. (in Russ.)
12. Lytkina, O. I. Problems of studying the concept in modern linguistics. Rhema, 2009, no. 4, pp. 67–80. (in Russ.)
13. Lytkina, O. I. To the question of the typology of concepts in modern linguistics. Rhema, 2010, no. 2, pp. 68–75. (in Russ.)
14. Meshcheryakov, B. G., Zinchenko, V. P. Big psychological dictionary. 4th ed. Moscow, AST; St. Petersburg, Prime-Eurosign, 2009, 811 p. (in Russ.)
15. Minsky, M. A framework for representing knowledge. Cambridge, 1974, 81 p.
16. Nikolaev, P. A. Literature and language. Modern illustrated encyclopedia. Moscow, Rosmen-Press, 2006, 584 p. (in Russ.)
17. Perls, F. S. Gestalt approach and Witness therapy: [Trans. from English]. Moscow, Libris, 1996, 240 p. (in Russ.)
18. Petukhov, V. V. The image of the world and the psychological study of thinking. Vestnik Moscow University. Series 14, Psychology, 1984, no. 4, pp. 13–20. (in Russ.)
19. Pimenova, E. E. Soul and spirit: features of conceptualization. Kemerovo, Graphics, 2004, 386 p. (in Russ.)
20. Pimenova, M. V. Conceptual research and national mentality. Humanitarian vector. Series: Peda-gogy, psychology, 2011, no. 4, pp. 126–132. (in Russ.)
21. Popova, Z. D., Sternin, I. A. Essays on cognitive linguistics. Voronezh, Voronezh State Uni. Press, 2001, 189 p. (in Russ.)
22. Serebrennikova, E. F. Dynamics and statics in the knowledge of the reality of language: approach-es, phenomena, methods of representation. Monograph. Ed. by E. F. Serebrennikova. Irkutsk, ISU, 2021, 285 p. (in Russ.)
23. Shvedova, N. Yu. Russian language: Selected works. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury Publ., 2005, 639 p. (in Russ.)
24. Slyshkin, G. G. Linguistic and cultural concepts and metaconcepts. Monograph. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2004, 339 p. (in Russ.)
25. Stepanov, Yu. S. Dictionary of Russian culture. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury Publ., 1997, 824 p. (in Russ.)
26. Sternin, I. A. Concepts and gaps. In: Linguistic consciousness: formation and functioning. Mos-cow, 1998, pp. 55–67. (in Russ.)
27. Sternin, I. A., Rosenfeld, M. Ya. Word and image. Monograph. Voronezh, Istoki Publ., 2008, 243 p. (in Russ.)
28. Velichkovsky, B. M. Cognitive science: the foundations of the psychology of knowledge. In 2 vols. Moscow, Smysl, Academia, 2006, vol. 2, 430 p. (in Russ.)
29. Vezhbitskaya, A. Semantic universals and description of languages. Moscow, Yazyki Russkoy kultury, 1999, 776 p. (in Russ.)
30. Xiao Kairong. Frame manipulation in translation. Southwest University, 2012. (in Chin.)
31. Xu Gaoyu l. Russian Psycholinguistics and Foreign Language Teaching. Beijing, Beijing Uni. Press, 2008, 360 p. (in Chinese)
32. Yan Kai, Zhu Huadun. Comparative Analysis of the Categorization of the Concept ОСЕНЬ (Autumn / Fall) in Russian and Chinese Language Consciousness. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguis-tics and Intercultural Communication, 2021, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87–103. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/ 1818-7935-2021-19-2-87-103
33. Yu Jinghe. Framework Semantics Research and Translation. Shanghai International Studies Uni-versity, 2005. (in Chin.)
34. Zhang Xinwei. A Multidimensional Study of the Russian Language World Landscape. Nanjing Normal University, 2012. (in Chin.)
35. Ziem, A. Frames und sprachliches Wissen. Kognitive Aspekte der semantischen Kompetenz. Hrsg.von Ekkehard Felder. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat: M. Hundt, W. A. Liebert, Th. Spranz-Fogasy, B. Wanning, I. H. Warnke, M. Wengeler. Berlin, New York, Walter de Greyter, 2008, 485 S.
Review
For citations:
Wang Zh., Dashinimaeva P.P. Frame, Gestalt and Image: Equivalence or Contiguity of Categorization? NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2022;20(2):29-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-2-29-40
Views:
366
Email this article 