Group Interpretation Structure of the “Russian” Concepts МУЖЧИНА (MAN)/ЖЕНЩИНА (WOMAN)

The issue of studying gender stereotypes in different cultures stems from the need to outline current trends in the variability of normative mental representation of men and women. A cognitive-communicative approach makes it possible to interpret conceptual changes in group language consciousness. A stereotype is understood both as a format of knowledge with a prototypical organization and as a cognitive scheme that structures a conceptual system. As part of the study a questionnaire was conducted and over 2,000 reactions about typically male (1,064) and female (1,053) characteristics were collected. The ranking of conceptual-thematic groups and their components determining the meaning of language categories is based on lexical representation of gender characteristics. The research methodology combines conceptual and definitional analyses of lexical units denoting stereotypical male and female qualities, as well as cognitive modeling of prototypical organization of the concepts under study. The aim of the research is to model a structure of basic gender concepts in their group interpretation. The prototypical core of the concept МУЖЧИНА (MAN) consists of traditional masculine characteristics (responsibility, strength, courage, bravery), while the core of the concept ЖЕНЩИНА (WOMAN) includes traditional feminine qualities (emotionality, caretaking, kindness). The pre-core zone of the concept МУЖЧИНА (MAN) is mainly expressed by orientation to achievement; public image; dedication to moral norms and principles. Intellect, family values and sociability are peripheral. The pre-core zone of the concept ЖЕНЩИНА (WOMAN) is characterized by career orientation; morality; communicativeness. Family values, expression of emotions, overcoming intelligence-based discrimination are peripheral, a woman’s appearance is the least frequent. Along with typical gender qualities, a transitional (metagender) zone can be distinguished, where traditional lexico-semantic characteristics of masculinity and femininity are being re-coded. Thus, gender categorization in the Russian speakers’ language consciousness can be defined as a binary model based on core prototypical characteristics. However, dynamic processes of gender neutralization competing with the most representative characteristics of basic gender concepts are observed at the boundary of concept zones.

1. Boldyrev, N. N. Dominant Principle of Linguistic Cognition Organization. Cognitive Studies of Language, 2019, no. 37, p. 37–44. (in Russ.)

2. Boldyrev, N. N. Language and the System of Knowledge. A Cognitive Theory of Language. 2nd ed. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2019, 480 p. (in Russ.)

3. Dubrovskaya, O. G. The Subjective Principle of the Formation of Socio-Cultural Specifics of Discourse. Doctoral Dissertation. Tambov, 2015, 407 p. (in Russ.)

4. Garanovich, M. V. Variability of Gender Stereotypes According to Social Parameters of Speakers. PhD Dissertation. Perm, 2011, 272 p. (in Russ.)

5. Gritsenko, E. S. Language as a Means of Constructing Gender. Doctoral Dissertation. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2005, 405 p. (in Russ.)

6. Gritsenko, E. S. New Trends in the Linguistic Study of Gender, its Conceptualization and Representation in Modern English. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2021, no. 3(49), pp. 60–73. (in Russ.)

7. Hofstede, G. Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Language, Communication and Social Environment, 2014, no. 12, pp. 9–49. (in Russ)

8. Kibrik, A. E. Cognitive Approach to Language. In: Language and Thought: Modern Cognitive Linguistics; Comp. V. V. Kibrik, A. D. Koshelev; Eds. A. A. Kibrik, A. D. Koshelev, A. V. Kravchenko, Yu. V. Mazurova, O. V. Fedorova. M.: Languages of Slavic Culture, 2015, pp. 29–59. (in Russ.)

9. Kirilina, A. V. Gender and Gender Linguistics at the Border of the Millennium. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2021, no. 3(49), pp. 109–147. (in Russ.)

10. Peeters, B. On Linguoculturology and Cultural Linguistics. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2019, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 6–11. (in Russ.)

11. Peeters, B. Making Proper Use of Stereotypes in the L2 French Classroom (trans. from French by A. F. Fefelov). NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2020, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 84–104. (in Russ.)

12. Serova, I. G. Sociocultural Construct “Gender” in the Interpretive Space of Language and Discourse. Doctoral Dissertation. Saint-Petersburg, 2017, 375 p. (in Russ)

13. Skrebtsova, T. G. Cognitive Linguistics: Classical Theories, New Approaches. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2018, 392 p. (in Russ.)

14. Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987, 631 p.

15. Putnam, H. Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, 1975, 457 p.

16. Putnam, H. Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1981, 222 p.

17. Rosh, E. Cognitive Reference Points. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, vol. 7, pp. 532–547.

18. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan, 1953, 250 p.