Intentionality and Its Representation in Monologue Campaign Speeches within the Framework of the US 2020 Election Discourse

Modern linguistics pays more and more attention to the issues of political discourse as a communicative activity that attracts a large amount of public attention. Politicians’ campaign speeches, widely studied by public relations specialists, are an effective tool for promoting certain ideas during election campaigns and events. This approach is especially common in the United States of America where political figures running for a particular post often make monologue campaign speeches on the national television and/or directly in front of the voters. From a linguistic point of view, the question how various linguistic means of expressing an intentional orientation are implemented in pre-election campaign speeches of prominent US politicians seems to be a most interesting one. The purpose of this article is to consider the phenomenon of speech intention in the context of monological campaign speeches in the discourse of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, as well as to identify intentional patterns in their public speech construction. The object of the study is the intentionality of the political figures’ speech behavior as the most important factor in their speech interaction with the audience. A selection of monologue speeches by politicians during the 2020 election campaigns were used as material for the study. One of our objectives is to identify the specificity of the use of intentional vocabulary, grammatical and stylistic means that contribute to the expression of the intentional component by the chosen US politicians in their campaign monologues. The author of the article believes that the intentionality of the American politicians’ speech behavior presupposes a pragmatic effect on the mass recipient. At the same time, the addressee, whether s/he is an ordinary voter or a linguist, must be able to decode the intentions of the addressor, realized by him/her through the intentional speech behavior.

1. Bezuglaya, L. R. Pragmalingvisticheskaya kontseptsiya I. P. Susova [The I. P. Susov Pragmatic Concept] // Susov I. P. Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika. Vinnitsa, Nova Knyga Publ., 2009. Pp. 249–260. (in Russ.)

2. Benua, V. L. Funktsional’naya teoriya diskursa politicheskoi kampanii [Functional theory of political campaign discourse] // Sovremennaya politicheskaya lingvistika. Ekaterinburg. 2006. Pp. 92–119. (in Russ.)

3. Dem’yankov, V. Z. Politicheskii diskurs kak predmet politologicheskoi filologii [Political discourse as a subject of political science] // Politicheskaya nauka. Politicheskii diskurs: istoriya i sovremennye issledovaniya. 2002. no. 3. Pp. 32–43. (in Russ.)

4. Kovalev, P. A. Intentsional’naya leksika i ee rol’ v opisanii obraza Uilla Frimana, personazha romana Nika Khornbi “Moi mal’chik” [Intentional vocabulary and its role in describing the image of Will Freeman of Nick Hornby’s «About a boy»] // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2021. Vol. 14, no. 8. Pp. 2475–2482. (in Russ.)

5. Kovalev, P. A. Aktualizatsiya intentsional’nosti v rechi Kamaly Kharris v ramkakh predvybornoi kampanii [Actualisation of intentionality in Kamala Harris’ Campaign Speech] // Uspekhi gumanitarnykh nauk. 2022. no. 9. Pp. 142–145. (in Russ.)

6. Mal’tseva, I. A. Manipulyativnye sposoby vozdeistviya na auditoriyu v kontekste sportivnogo mediadiskursa (na primere federal’nogo telekanala «Match-TV») [Manipulative ways of influence on the audience in the context of sports media (on the example of the federal TV channel «Match-TV»)] // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Filologicheskie nauki. 2022. Vol. 8 (74). no. 1. Pp. 177–187. (in Russ.)

7. Moshcheva, S. E. Rechevaya intentsiya: teoreticheskie podkhody k issledovaniyu [Speech intention: theoretical approaches to research] // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2011. Vol. 2. no. 3. Pp. 223–226. (in Russ.)

8. Orazalinova, K. A. Kommunikativnye smysly soglasiya i sposoby ikh verbalizatsii v russkom yazyke [Communicative meanings of consent and ways of their verbalization in Russian] // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. 2012. Vol. 62. no. 2 (256). Pp. 81–85. (in Russ.)

9. Styrina, E. V., Martirosyan, A. A. Elementy fiktsional’nosti v mediatekstakh: stolknovenie real’nogo i vymyshlennogo [Elements of fictionality in mediatexts: collision of real and fictional] // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya. 2021. Vol. 19, no. 1. Pp. 92–105. (in Russ.)

10. Shakirova, E. R. Intentsiya govoryashchego i aspekty ee realizatsii: Na materiale angliiskogo yazyka [Speaking intention and implementation aspects: in English language material]. Cand. Sci. (Philol.) Dissertation. 2003. 166 p. (in Russ.)

11. Shmeleva, E. S. Kognitivnye mekhanizmy i pragmaticheskii potentsial lingvokreativnosti (na materiale The Economist) [Cognitive mechanisms and the pragmatic potential of linguisticity (on The Economist)] // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya. 2020. Vol. 18, no. 3. Pp. 78–86. (in Russ.)

12. Yur’eva, E. V. Strategii i taktiki rechevogo vozdeistviya v diskurse sotsial’noi reklamy [Strategies and tactics of speech influence in the discourse of social advertising] // Vostochnoslavyanskaya filologiya. Yazykoznanie. 2018. no. 7(33). Pp. 208–222. (in Russ.)

13. Dennet, D. Intentionality // The Oxford Companion to the Mind / ed. by R. L. Gregory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. Pp. 383–386.

14. Hymes, D. On communicative competence / Sociolinguistics / ed. by J.B. Pride, J. Holmes. Harmondsworth. 1972. Pp. 269–293.

15. Priest, G. Towards non-being: the logic and metaphysics of intentionality. – Oxford: Clarendon press. 2005. 190 p.

16. Rotenstreich, N. Theory and practice: An essay in human intentionalities. – The Hague: Nijhoff. 1977. 239 p.

17. Searle, J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge. 1976. 184 p.