Experience in Measuring Productivity of Suffix Morphemes in Chinese Military News Discourse Based on a Universal Measure

The article studies the issues of measuring derivational productivity of affixes. It considers the concept of productivity and its various aspects which can be quantified by corpus linguistics methods. In particular, it analyzes the measures of “expanding” and “potential” productivity by H. Baayen, and proposes a new formula for “universal” productivity on the basis of the analysis. These three productivity measures are applied to 80 Chinese suffix morphemes (suffixes and semi-suffixes) within a thematic collection of texts – Chinese media reports on military topics for 2019. The language material comprises 2066 texts (2.852.262 characters). The study resulted in three variants of the rating list for the most productive suffix morphemes of the Chinese military news discourse, which can be used for didactic and applied purposes. H. Baayen’s “expanding productivity” and the “universal productivity” proposed in the work showed a high correlation (0.85), while H. Baayen’s “potential productivity” correlates with them negatively. A meaningful analysis of the results also brings up a question of the appropriateness of using the “potential productivity” measure. Comparison of existing measures and the formula proposed in the work allow us to conclude that for an approximate assessment of the suffix morphemes productivity one can use the formula of “expanding productivity” by H. Baayen, which, despite relying only on the single word token (hapax legomenon) frequency, gives quite plausible results. To measure the suffix morphemes productivity more precisely, it is recommended to use the “universal productivity” formula proposed in this paper which takes into account a larger number of significant parameters (the number of hapax legomena with the estimated affix, the total type count with the given affix, and the average regular word token frequency of the estimated affix) and is more reasonable in this respect.

1. Korshunov, D. S. Frequency of suffixal morphemes as a characteristic of Chinese news military discourse. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities. 2022. Vol. 10 (865). Pp. 48–56. 10.52070/2542-2197_2022_10_865_48 (in Russ.)

2. Kubryakova, E. S. What is word formation? Moscow: “Nauka” Publ., 1965. 78 p. (in Russ.)

3. Kuznetsova, A. I., Lavrenova, O. A. On the existence of a correlation between the productivity and use of affixes in Russian. Studies in Structural and Applied Linguistics. Issue 7. Moscow: Moscow University Publ., 1975. Pp. 83–99. (in Russ.)

4. Lopatin, V. V., Ulukhanov, I. S. Dictionary of derivational affixes of the modern Russian language. Moscow: “Azbukovnik” Publ., 2016. 812 p. (in Russ.)

5. Modeling in corpus linguistics: specialized corpora of the Russian language / V. P. Zakharov, I. V. Azarova, O. A. Mitrofanova, A. M. Popov, M. V. Khokhlova; resp. ed. V. P. Zakharov. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publ., 2019. 208 p.

6. Khamatova, A. A. Word formation of the modern Chinese language. Moscow: “Muravey” Publ., 2003, 224 p. (in Russ.)

7. Shansky, N. M. Essays on Russian word formation and lexicology. Moscow: “Uchpedgiz” Publ., 1959. 246 p. (in Russ.)

8. Arcodia, G. F., Basciano, B. On the productivity of the Chinese suffixes − 兒 −r, −化 −huà and −頭 –tou. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics. 2012. Vol. 10.2. Pp. 89–118.

9. Arcodia, G. F., Basciano, B. The Construction Morphology Analysis of Chinese Word Formation. In: Booij, G. (eds). The Construction of Words. Studies in Morphology, vol 4. Springer, Cham. 2018. Pp. 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_9

10. Baayen, R. H. A Corpus-Based Study of Morphological Productivity: Statistical Analysis and Psychological Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation. Free University, Amsterdam, 1989.

11. Baayen, R. H. Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. Volume 2: An International Handbook, edited by Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2009. Pp. 899–919. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.899

12. Bauer, L. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics (95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 245 p. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486210

13. Bareato, S., Basciano, B. Chinese Affixes in the Internet Era: A Corpus-Based Study of X-族 zú, X-党 dǎng and X-客 kè Neologisms. In: Corpus-Based Research on Chinese Language and Linguistics / Ed. by B. Basciano, F. Gatti, A. Morbiato. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, 2020. Pp. 239–282.

14. Nishimoto, E. Measuring and Comparing the Productivity of Mandarin Chinese Suffixes. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing. 2003. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 49–76.

15. Plag, I., Dalton-Puffer, C., Baayen, H. Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language and Linguistics. 1999. Vol. 3 (2). Pp. 209–228. DOI: 10.1017/S1360674399000222

16. Saade, B. Quantitative approaches to productivity and borrowing in Maltese derivation. Morphology. 2020. Vol. 30 (2). Pp. 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09358-2

17. Shen, T., Baayen, R. H. Adjective–noun compounds in Mandarin: a study on productivity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 2022. Vol. 18 (3). Pp. 543–572. DOI: 10.1515/cllt-2020-0059

18. Sproat, R., Shih, C. A corpus-based analysis of Mandarin nominal root compound. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. 1996. Vol. 5. Pp. 49–71. DOI: 10.1007/BF00129805

19. Tseng, Y.-H., Hsieh, Sh., Chen, P.-Y., Court, S. Computational Modeling of Affixoid Behavior in Chinese Morphology. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, 2020. Pp. 2879–2888. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.258

20. 王春娇,盛玉麒 (Wang Chunjiao, Sheng Yuqi).当代汉语新兴表称谓“类词缀”研究 (Study on the Emerging Appellation Affix in Contemporary Chinese) // 中文教学现代化学报.2019年6月.第8 卷,第1期.46-54页. (In Chin.)