On the Issue of Virtual Onomastic Space (on the Example of the Names of Virtual Assistants)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2024-22-4-142-155
Abstract
This article is devoted to the study of virtual onyms, in particular, the names of virtual assistants. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that virtual space language is a special linguistic and cultural system. New objects that appear, require identification. Proper names of virtual space (virtual assistants, chat bots, virtual agents) do not have a nominative function only. While giving names to virtual assistants, national and international companies try to make these names simple, memorable, unique, and special – with a certain cultural and national flavor. The purpose of our research is to analyze and make an attempt to classify the existing names of virtual assistants as well as clarify this type of terminology. The research material was the names of virtual assistants working in the Russian and foreign markets. The results obtained complement our understanding of the development of onomastics in virtual space. The paper confirms the idea that the names of virtual assistants are structural elements of the onomastic space of the virtual information environment. We have found that the names of voice assistants have a certain implicitness and often emphasize social and linguocultural uniqueness. One can also note the active use of the names of famous literary characters, exotisms, and neologisms. The theoretical significance of the study lies in enriching our knowledge of modern virtual onomastic space. The practical significance is in demonstrating the main trends in the naming of voice assistants, which may resonate with marketers and virtual assistant developers.
About the Author
M. N. Dubinina
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria N. Dubinina, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Foreign Languages
Moscow
References
1. Andrenko K. V. Linguistic mechanisms of personification of a virtual interlocutor. In: Speech People-II: International Youth Scientific and Practical Blog Conference, Ulyanovsk, April 23–30, 2023 / Rep. editor Yu.A. Lobina. Ulyanovsk: Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after I.N. Ulyanova, 2023, pp. 6–11. (in Russ.).
2. Anikina T. V. A virtual proper name in system of modern communication. Ural Journal of Philology. Series: Language. System. Personality: Creative linguistics, 2012, no. 2, pp. 56–60. (in Russ.).
3. Boguspayev N. B., Samsonenko A. I., Zhumagali S. ZH., Azimbayeva A. A. Intelligent voice assistant “Galia”. The Bulletin of Kazakh Academy of Transport and Communications named after M. Tynyshpayev, 2022, no. 1(120), pp. 171–175. (in Russ.).
4. Vasilyeva N. V. Terminological model with the element -onym: retrospective, present and future. In: Regional onomastics: problems and prospects for research: collection of scientific articles. Vitebsk: Vitebsk State University named after. P.M. Masherova, 2022, pp. 8–12. (in Russ.).
5. Gudym G. V. Internet anthroponimics. Culture. Science. Integration, 2014, no. 1(25), pp. 73–76. (in Russ.).
6. Daldinova E. O., Buraeva T. B. The characteristic structure of German speaking siteonym. Bulletin of Issyk-Kul University, 2023, no. 54-2, pp. 65–73. (in Russ.).
7. Yenin S. A. Onomastic features of self-identification and stylistic functions of Chinese mononyms in the communicative Internet space of China. In: Foreign languages in the modern world: Materials of the international scientific and practical student conference, Rostov-on-Don, December 02 2021. – Rostov-on-Don: Rostov State Economic University “RINH”, 2021, pp. 274–278. (in Russ.).
8. Zenenko N. V., Son L. P. Virtual reality: virtual image VS virtual personality. Kazan Science, 2021, no. 1, pp. 87−90. (in Russ.).
9. Zimina I. I., Savartseva N. V. On the issue of the features of virtual anthroponyms in Internet communication. Dialogue of cultures − dialogue about peace and for the sake of peace, 2014, no. 2, pp. 67–72. (in Russ.).
10. Zubareva A. V. Nickname as special type of onym: in search of integrated sign. Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, 2018, no. 4, pp. 115–123. https://doi.org/10.23683/1995- 0640-2018-4-115-123 (in Russ.).
11. Kiseleva YU. P. Perception of anthropomorphic robots. In: Professionalism and creativity in conditions of transitivity: an international collection of scientific works. Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorsk State Technical University named after. G.I. Nosova, 2018, pp. 31–35. (in Russ.).
12. Korbut A. M. Domestication of artificial intelligence: smart speakers and transformation of everyday life. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2021, no. 1(161), pp. 193– 216. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1808 (in Russ.).
13. Madiyeva G. B., Suprun V. I. General problems of onomastics. In: Theory and practice of onomastic and derivatological research: Collective monograph in memory of the Honored Scientist of the Republic of Adygea and Kuban, Professor Roza Yusufovna Namitokova / Scientific editors V.I. Suprun, S.V. Ilyasova. Maykop: Publishing house “Magarin Oleg Grigorievich”, 2017, pp. 11– 51. (in Russ.).
14. Morozova A. A. Speech portrait of voice assistant “Alice”. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2021, no. 9(455), pp. 95–100. https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2021-10914 (in Russ.).
15. Nesterova T. V. Alisa, let’s chat! (about politeness and rudeness in online discourse). In: Humanitarian technologies in the modern world: Collection of materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kaliningrad, May 30 – June 1, 2019. Kaliningrad: Western branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation, 2019, pp. 85–89. (in Russ.).
16. Podyukov I. A. Onomastic representation of the otherworld in Russian popular language and culture. Voprosy onomastiki, 2019, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 125–139. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2019.16.3.035 (in Russ.).
17. Son L. P. Virtual onomastics and non-verbal component of Internet communication. Scientific Newsletter of Voronezh State University of architecture and civil engineering. Series: Modern Linguistic and Methodical-and-Didactic Researches, 2012, no. 18. pp. 123–134. (in Russ.).
18. Superanskaya A. V. General theory of proper names. LKI, 2007, 368 p. (in Russ.).
19. Khusyainov T. M. “Thank you, Siri!”: the problem of human interaction with virtual voice assistants. In: Civilization-society-person: Scientific and educational almanac. Saratov, Limited Liability Company Publishing House “KUBiK”, 2020, pp. 61–62. (in Russ.).
20. Shcherbak A. S. Cognitive foundations of regional onomastics. Tambov: Tambov: Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavina, 2012, 319 p. (in Russ.).
21. Chattaraman V., Kwon W., Gilbert J.E., Ross K. Should AI-Based, conversational digital assistants employ social- or task-oriented interaction style? A task-competenc and reciprocity perspective for older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, vol. 90, pp. 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.048
22. Feine J., Gnewuch U., Morana S., Maedche A. A Taxonomy of Social Cues for Conversational Agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2019, 132, рр. 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.009
23. Gambino A., Fox J., Ratan R. A. Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers Are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication, 2020, vol. 1, pp. 71–86. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.5
24. Habler F., Schwind V., Henze N. Effects of Smart Virtual Assistants’ Gender and Language. In: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer, 2019, pp. 469–473. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3344441
25. Munnukka J., Talvitie-Lamberg K., Maity D. Anthropomorphism and social presence in Human– Virtual service assistant interactions: The role of dialog length and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 2022, vol. 135, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107343
26. Pradhan A., Findlater L., Lazar A. “Phantom Friend” or “Just a Box with Information”: Personification and Ontological Categorization of Smart Speaker-based Voice Assistants by Older Adults. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2019, 3(CSCW), pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359316
27. Xiong Y., Yu Q., Liu N. Influence of Voice Characteristics and Language Style of Intelligent Assistant on User Trust and Intention to Use. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Cham., 2024, vol. 14702, pp. 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60913-8_26
28. Ding Xiaowen, Zhang Sen, Liu Wei, Song Guanyu. Research on personalized design of intelligent vehicle voice assistant. Automotive Electrical Appliances, 2023, vol. 7, рр. 33–36. https://doi.org/10.13273/j.cnki.qcdq.2023.07.018 (In Chinese).
29. Wang Shuwan. “Bias” or “Advantage”: The feminization of AI voice assistants. Southeast Communication, 2021, vol. 6, рр. 107–108. https://doi.org/10.13556/j.cnki.dncb.cn35-1274/j.2021.06.033 (In Chinese).
30. Wu Ying. Evaluation of language ability of Huawei’s intelligent voice assistant “Xiaoyi”. Popular Literature and Art, 2023, рр. 97–99. https://doi.org/10.20112/j.cnki.ISSN1007-5828.2023.12.033 (In Chinese).
31. Yang Zhihui. Language ability assessment of voice assistant Siri from the perspective of linguistics. Chinese Character Culture, 2022, vol. 6, рр. 156–157. https://doi.org/10.14014/j.cnki.cn11-2597/g2.2022.06.018 (In Chinese).
Review
For citations:
Dubinina M.N. On the Issue of Virtual Onomastic Space (on the Example of the Names of Virtual Assistants). NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2024;22(4):142-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2024-22-4-142-155
Views:
53
Email this article 