Cross-cultural Differences in the Perception of Affective Visual Stimuli by Russians and Americans

The article presents the results of a cross-cultural affective images perception study by Americans and Russians and reveals the degree of cultural factor influence on the stimuli assessment by American and Russian men and women. The hypothesis is that assessments of affective images by American and Russian respondents will have statistical differences due to the linguistic and cultural specificity of the ethnic groups; it is also assumed there are cross-cultural gender differences in the assessment. The study used the method of psycholinguistic questioning with seven-point scaling. 84 images from the open American database of affective images (“Open Affective Standardized Image Set”) were used as research material. The respondents were 34 men and 58 women. The results of the analysis did not show significant cross-cultural differences in ratings of affective images with reference to valence type or emotional evaluation/response. In general, Americans and Russians had a similar distribution of image ratings. However, a statistically significant difference has been found in the ratings of images with different valence types (P < 0.001). Negative and positive images were rated higher by Russians in terms of emotional evaluation, in contrast to Americans, most of whose emotional responses had neutral ratings. There was also a statistically significant difference in the ratings of different thematic images (P < 0.05). Nature images were rated by Russians as causing a feeling of comfort, while Americans noted their neutral impact on them. Images of objects, on the contrary, received the opposite ratings from the respondents. Moreover, cross-cultural gender differences have been revealed between Russian and American women in image ratings based on emotional evaluation and valence parameters (P < 0.05). Russian women rated most of the images as having a positive or negative impact, while the majority of American women’s ratings tended to be neutral. This confirms the influence of the emotional stimulus, valence type, image theme, as well as gender factor on the processing of emotionally coloured units by representatives of different cultures.

1. Bianchin M., Angrilli A. Gender differences in emotional responses: A psychophysiological study. Physiology & Behavior, 2012, vol. 105(4), pp. 925–932. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.031

2. Bradley M. M., Codispoti M., Sabatinelli D., Emotion PP. J. Emotion and motivation II: sex differences in picture processing. Emotion – 2001, vol. 1(3), pp. 300-319.

3. Bromberek-Dyzman K., Rafał J. Cross-linguistic differences affect emotion and emotion-laden word processing: Evidence from Polish-English and Romanian-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2021, vol. 25 (5), pp. 1161–1182. DOI: 10.1177/1367006920987306

4. Chen C., Messinger D. S., Yan H., Duan Y., Ince R., Garrod O., Schyns PP. G., Jack R. E. Cultural facial expressions dynamically convey emotion category and intensity information. Curr Biol., 2024, vol. 34 (1), pp. 213–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.001.

5. Codispoti. M., Surcinelli PP., Baldaro B. Watching emotional movies: Affective reactions and gender differences. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2008, vol. 69(2), pp. 90–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.004.

6. Dewaele J. M. Expressing anger in multiple languages. In: Pavlenko A. (ed.) Bilingual Minds: Emotional Experience, Expression and Representation. Clevedon, UK, Multilingual Matters Ltd., 2006, pp. 118–151

7. Fernández C. E., Pascual J., Soler J., Elices M., Portella M., Fernández-Abascal. Physiological responses induced by emotion-eliciting films. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 2012, vol. 37(2), pp. 73–79. DOI:10.1007/s10484-012-9180-7

8. Gorelov I. N. Nonverbal components of communication. Moscow. Nauka publ., 1980, 266 p. (in Russ.)

9. Kosonogov V. V. The effects of the order of picture presentation on the subjective emotional evaluation of pictures. Psicologia, 2020, vol. 34(2), pp. 171-178. DOI:10.17575/psicologia.v34i2.1608 Kreidlin G. E. Nonverbal semiotics: body language and natural language. Moscow, 2004, 581 p. (in Russ.).

10. Kurdi B., Lozano S., Banaji R. Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS). Behav Res Methods, 2017, pp. 457–470.

11. Larina T. V. A smile opens many doors: emotions in communication and translation. Bridges. Journal of Translators, 2006, no. 4 (12), pp. 50‒55 (in Russ.).

12. Lim N. Cultural differences in emotion: differences in emotional arousal level between the East and the West. Integrative Medicine Research, 2016, vol. 5(2), pp. 105–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2016.03.004

13. Magomedov PP. Sh., Sharbuzova Kh. Z. Cross-cultural study of gender differences in values. News of the DSPU, 2019, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 101‒110. DOI: 10.31161/1995-0659-2019-13-4-101-110 (in Russ.)

14. Marchewka A. The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): Introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behavior Research Methods, 2013, vol. 46, pp. 596–610. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1

15. Masuda T., Ellsworth PP. C., Mesquita B., Leu J., Tanida S., de Veerdonk E. V. Placing the face in context: cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2008, vol. 94 (3), pp. 365–381. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.365

16. Matsumoto D. American-Japanese cultural differences in judgements of expression intensity and subjective experience. Cogn. Emotion, 1999, vol. 13, pp. 201–218.

17. Matsumoto D., Yoo S. H., Fontaine J. Mapping expressive differences around the world: the relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Cross. Cult. Psychol., 2008, vol. 39, pp. 55–74. DOI: 10.1177/0022022107311854

18. Naranowicz M., Jankowiak K., Behnke M. Mood and gender effects in emotional word processing in unbalanced bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2023, vol. 27 (1), pp. 39–60. DOI: 10.1177/13670069221075646

19. Ovsyanik O. A., Farber A. V. Cross-cultural gender characteristics of value orientations of women managers. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Psychological Sciences, 2021, no. 4, pp. 107–116. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7235-2021-4-107-116 (in Russ.)

20. Panayiotou A. Bilingual emotions: The untranslatable self. Estudios de Sociolinguıstica, 2004, vol. 5 (1), pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.1558/sols.v5i1.1

21. Pavlenko A. Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2008, vol. 11 (2), pp. 147–164. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728908003283

22. Pavlenko A. Emotions and the body in Russian and English. Pragmatics and Cognition, 2002, vol. 10 (1–2), pp. 201–236.

23. Pogosyan. M., Engelmann J. B. Cultural differences in affect intensity perception in the context of advertising. Front. Psychol., 2011. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00313

24. Shakhovsky V. I. Linguistic theory of emotions. M., 2008. 416 pp. (in Russ.)

25. Stepanova Sachs, O. & Coley J. Envy and jealousy in Russian and English: Labeling and conceptualization of emotions by monolinguals and bilinguals. In Pavlenko (ed.). 2006, pp. 209–231. DOI:10.21832/9781853598746-010

26. Tanaka A., Koizumi A., Imai H., Hiramatsu S., Hiramoto E., Gelder B. I feel your voice: Cultural differences in the multisensory perception of emotion. Psychological science, 2010, vol. 21 (9), pp. 1259–1262 DOI: 10.1177/0956797610380698

27. Ter-Minasova S. G. Language and intercultural communication. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2004, 352 p (in Russ.)

28. Vaid J. Joking Across Languages: Perspectives on Humor, Emotion, and Bilingualism. Bilingual Minds. Edited by Aneta Pavlenko. 2016, pp. 118–152.

29. Vrana S., Rollock D. The role of ethnicity, gender, emotional content, and contextual differences in physiological, expressive, and self-reported emotional responses to imagery. Cognition and Emotion, 2002, vol. 16 (1), pp. 165–192.

30. Wierzbicka A. Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow, 1996, 411 p. (in Russ.)

31. Wierzbicka A. Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 237.