Metaphor Power of Military Doctrines in Russian, Chinese and American English

Metaphor in modern linguistics is understood not only as a means of decorating speech, but also as a means of structuring, transforming and creating new knowledge, evoking emotions, influencing the perception. The article aims to estimate the potential speech impact of the military doctrines’ texts with the help of the metaphor power quantitative index. The methodology is based on calculating the indices of metaphor density (MDI), intensity (MII) and functionality of metaphors in the text (MfPI). The theoretical basis of the research is the conceptual metaphor theory by J. Lakoff and M. Johnson, as well as ideas about the metaphor power and the potential persuasiveness of metaphors in the text and discourse, most fully presented in the works on meta-analysis of the metaphor speech impact by P. Sopory and S. van Stee. Thus, we assume that the higher the density of metaphors in the text, the higher is the per-suasiveness of the given speech message. Metaphors of different intensity are based on two different cognitive mechanisms, namely, categorization and comparison, and affect the recipient in different ways, since they are perceived differently by him. Conventional metaphors tend to have a so-called cognitive effect, and new “creative” metaphors, in turn, may have a considerable emotional impact. Different types of metaphors also have different functions: orientational metaphors perform a descriptive function, ontological metaphors are used to explain (translate) complex objects and phenomena, identifying them in the mind of recipients, structural metaphors serve the purpose of restructuring the signified (le signifié in terms of Saussure) of an object or phenomenon, changing the recipient’s point of view on the subject. The material under study includes the latest published doctrinal military documents – the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation (2014), the White Paper “China’s Defense in the New Era” (2019), and a Summary of the US National Defense Strategy (2020). The empiric results of the study show that the metaphor power of the Chinese text in comparison with American English and Russian is higher in terms of the density and intensity of the metaphors used, which indicates the intention to make the White Paper more convincing and emotionally affecting. “The US National Defense Strategy” is less saturated with novel metaphors, but at the same time it uses a greater number of structural metaphors, which indicates the intention to produce a cognitive declarative impact rather than emotional effect. The text of the Russian Military Doctrine has the lowest indices of the density and intensity of metaphors; the number of structural metaphors found in it was also the smallest, which leads us to conclude that this document highlights the informative function, having the identifying nature. The method of metaphor power analysis proposed and tested in this study allows us to single out two different types of speech impact – emotional and cognitive –, as well as makes it possible to express quantitatively their degree. In addition, the values of the metaphorical indices can be used to specify the genre and style of texts under study.

1. Budaev, E. V. War as a sphere-a source of metaphorical conceptualization of modern Russia in the UK media. In: Memory of generations: the Great Patriotic War in education, museum space and social networks. Materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation. Yekaterinburg, USPU, 2020, p. 8–13. (in Russ.)

2. Bogolubov, А. F. Bring us de iverance, spy! (Interpretations of The Spies’ March in Time of the Media War and Pandemic). NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2020, no. 2, p. 132–153. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/1818-7935-2020-18-2-132-153

3. Velikova, L. N. Anthropomorphism and metaphoricity of the category of time. Language and culture, 2014, no. 11, p. 169–172. (in Russ.)

4. Kalinin, O. I. Discursive metaphor of the coronavirus in the PRC media. Vestnik MGLU. Humanities, 2020a, no. 8 (837), p. 26–37. (in Russ.)

5. Kalinin, O. I. The correlation between metaphor content and the message persuasive power. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2020, no. 4, р. 82–92 (in Russ.) DOI 10.29025/2079-6021-2020-4-82-92

6. Kalinin, О. I., Mavleeva, D. V. Comparative Analysis of Coronavirus-Related Discursive Metaphors in PRC and ROK Media. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2020, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 99–109. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/1818-7935-2020-18-4-99-109

7. Kovalchuk, O. V. Metaphoricity as a defining feature of the diplomatic discursive space. Current issues of psycholinguistics, 2019, vol. 39, no. 1, p. 252–261. (in Russ.)

8. Lakoff, J., Johnson, M. Metaphors That We Live By. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2004, 256 p. (in Russ.)

9. Mavleev, R. R., Fomin, A. G. Political metaphor as an effective means of influence (based on the material of speeches by Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin within the framework of the International Forum “One Belt – One Road”. Political Linguistics, 2017, vol. 66, no. 6, p. 112–121 (in Russ.)

10. Safonova, M. A. Linguistic parameters of stylistic variation in the biographical text (based on the English-language biographies of Winston Spencer Churchill). NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2018, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 69–83. (in Russ.)

11. Sun, Yu., Kalinin, O. I., Ignatenko, A. V. The use of metaphoricity indices for analyzing the speech impact of metaphors in the texts of public speeches of politicians. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 232–258. (in Russ.) DOI 10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-00-00

12. Boeynaems, A. et al. The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review. Metaphor and Symbol, 2017, vol. 32, no. 2, p. 118–134. DOI 10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623

13. Branum, J., Charteris-Black, J. The Edward Snowden affair: A corpus study of the British press. Discourse and Communication, 2015, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 199–220. DOI 199-220.10.1177/1750481314568544

14. Burgers, C. et al. Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: the effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 2015, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 515–532. DOI 10.1080/02650487.2014.996200

15. Giora, R. et al. Weapons of Mass Distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 2004, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 115–141. DOI 10.1207/s15327868ms1902_2

16. Hartman, T. K. Toll Booths on the Information Superhighway? Policy Metaphors in the Case of Net Neutrality. Political Communication, 2012, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 278–298. DOI 10.1080/10584609.2012.694983

17. Hoeken, H. et al. Using Message Form to Stimulate Conversations: The Case of Tropes. Communication Theory, 2009, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 49–65. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01332.x

18. Landtsheer, C. De. Collecting Political Meaning from the Count of Metaphor. In: Metaphor and Discourse. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009, p. 59–78.

19. Sopory, P. Metaphor and Attitude Accessibility. Southern Communication Journal. 2006, vol. 71, no. 3, p. 251–272. DOI 10.1080/10417940600846037

20. Stee, S van. Meta-Analysis of the Persuasive Effects of Metaphorical vs. Literal Messages. Com-munication Studies, 2018, vol. 69, no. 5, p. 545–566. DOI 10.1080/10510974.2018.1457553

21. Thibodeau, P. H., Boroditsky, L. Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLoS One, 2011, vol. 6, no. 2, p. e16782. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782