On Verbal Construction Frequency in Certain Genres of Popular Literature

Corpora-based language studies is a widespread practice in modern linguistics. In our study, we address so-called mass literature (or paraliterature) via a corpus of texts. The standardization of mass literature allows us to describe its genres by applying literary formulas. In brief, a formula serves for the embodiment of cultural themes and stereotypes in a universal form. While mass literature is a common subject of literary and cultural studies, from a linguistic point of view, literary formulas have not been studied well enough. We suggest that differences between the microgenres of paraliterature may be in syntax as well as in the vocabulary. Our work is based on the mass literature corpora and provides analysis of verb constructions characteristic of microgenres (love story, detective story, science fiction novel, and fantasy). In order to identify the distinctive features of mass literature microgenres, we have conducted a series of machine learning experiments. As a dataset, we compiled a corpus of 1,200 texts belonging to four microgenres. In our previous studies we showed that statistical features (text length, sentence length, and parts of speech frequencies) were insufficient for successful classification. The usage of lexical features has improved the quality of machine learning, however, the classifier based on syntactic features has shown the best results. 81 constructions have been selected as the most important features of syntactic-based machine learning. A verb construction consists of a “verb + dependencies”. We consider several types of dependencies: arguments (subject, direct and indirect objects) and adjuncts (subordinate clause and adverbial classifier). The constructions are described in terms of the fullness of the verb valencies. Several types of constructions are distinguished: complete, incomplete (with omissions of direct or indirect complements), and extended (with adjuncts). Specific examples of verb constructions in each of the microgenres have been analyzed and described. Based on the similarity of the construction profile, romance novels and detective stories show the predominance of verbs and direct speech constructions, whereas science fiction novels and fantasy demonstrate the prevalence of full constructions. Possible non-textual explanations for our observations are also provided. The method proposed in the study can be used for the investigation of various kinds of syntactic features, for instance, those associated with the author’s, temporal or genre specificities.

1. Apresyan, Yu. D. Lexical conversion in Russian. Linguistica Silesiana, 1975, 1, pp. 256–283. (in Russ.).

2. Apresyan, Yu. D. Experimental Study of the Semantics of the Russian Verb. Moscow. Nauka Publ, 1967, 251 p. (in Russ.)

3. Bujlova, N. N., Lyashevskaya, O. N. Lexical-Syntactic Markers of Minor Literary Genres. Vestnik PSTGU, 2021, 66, pp. 11–23. (in Russ.)

4. Byjlova, N. Amateur Prose on the Web: Verb Construction as a Feature of Genre Classification. In: Proc. of ARANEA 2018. Web Corpora as a Language Training Tool. Slovakia, Bratislava, 2018.

5. Cawelty, J. G. Adventure, Mystery and Romance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

6. Couégnas, D. Introduction à la paralittérature. P.: Seuil, 1992.

7. Fillmore, Ch. Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora. In: Proc. of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, NY, USA, 1986, pp. 95–107.

8. Fillmore, Сh. Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language. In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech. Berkeley, NY, USA, 1976, pp. 20–32.

9. Ganapol’skaya, E. V. Phraseological Dictionary of Modern Russian Detective Literature: in 2 vol. Saint-Petersburg, Zlatoust Publ, 2015–2016, 256 p. (in Russ.)

10. Goldberg А. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

11. Kupina, N. A., Litovskaya, M. A., Nikolina, N. A. Mass Literature Today: A Tutorial. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ, 2009, 423 p. (in Russ.)

12. Kustova, G. I. Types of Derivative Meanings and Mechanisms of Language Development. Moscow, Yazyki rossiskoi kultury Publ, 2004, 471 p. (in Russ.)

13. Paducheva, E. V. Dynamic Models in Vocabulary Semantics. Moscow, Yazyki rossiskoi kultury Publ, 2004, 607 p. (in Russ.)

14. Rahilina, E. Linguistics of Constructions. M.: Azbukovnik, 2010.

15. Stefanowitsch, A., Gries, S. T. Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions. Inter. Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2003, no. 8(2), pp. 209–243.

16. Tesnière, L. Esquisse d’une syntaxe structurale. P.: Klincksieck, 1953.

17. Valdaeva, T. N. Is the Pink Romance Alive: Reading Environment and Popular Genre. In: Kul’turnye iniciativy: materialy 50 Vserossijskoj s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem nauchnoj konferencii molodyh issledovatelej, 2018, pp. 111–114. (in Russ.)