ПРЕДПОЧТЕНИЕ ВЫСОКОГО ПРИСОЕДИНЕНИЯ АДЪЮНКТА ПРИ СЛОЖНОЙ ИМЕННОЙ ГРУППЕ В ПРОЦЕССЕ РАЗРЕШЕНИЯ СИНТАКСИЧЕСКОЙ НЕОДНОЗНАЧНОСТИ НОСИТЕЛЯМИ МОНГОЛЬСКОГО ЯЗЫКА
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2018-16-4-39-47
Аннотация
Об авторах
М. С. ВласовРоссия
В. И. Павлов
Россия
Д. Ундармаа
Россия
Т. И. Громогласова
Россия
Список литературы
1. Драгой О. В. Разрешение синтаксической неоднозначности: правила и вероятности // Вопр. языкознания. 2006. № 6. С. 44-61.
2. Чернова Д. А. Синтаксический анализ предложения в процессе восприятия речи: экспериментальное исследование обработки синтаксически неоднозначных конструкций в русском языке // Вестн. Перм. ун-та. Рос. и заруб. филология. 2015. № 1 (29). С. 36-45.
3. Anisimov V. N., Fedorova O. V., Latanov A. V. Eye Movement Parameters in Reading Sentences with Syntactic Ambiguities in Russian // Human Physiology (Moscow). 2014. Vol. 40, № 5. P. 521-531.
4. Antinucci F., Duranti A., Gebert L. Relative clause structure, relative clause perception, and the change from SOV to SVO // Cognition. 1979. Vol. 7, Issue 2. P. 145-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(79)90018-0
5. Batchuluun D. A contrastive grammar of Mongolian and English. Charis Storms & Brock David (Eds). Soyombo Printing Company, Ulaanbaatar. 2013. ISBN 99929-9-146-1
6. Fodor J.D. Learning to parse? // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1998. Vol. 27. P. 285-319.
7. Fodor J.D. Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading // Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 32. Amherst: GSLA, Univ. of Massachusetts. 2002. P. 113-132.
8. Frazier L., Fodor J.D. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model // Cognition. 1978. Vol. 6. P. 291-326.
9. Gibson E., Schütze C., Salomon A. The relationship between the frequency and the complexity of linguistic structure // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1996. Vol. 25. P. 59-92.
10. Grillo N., Costa A. A novel argument for the universality of parsing principles // Cognition. 2014. Vol. 133, №1. P. 156-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.019
11. Heydel M., Murray W.S. On-line and off-line effects in relative clause attachment - A matter of individual preference? // Paper presented at the 18th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Arizona, Tucson. 2005.
12. Hirose Y. Recycling prosodic boundaries // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2003. Vol. 32. P. 167-195.
13. Hirotani M., Frazier L., Rayner K. Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye-movements // Journal of Memory and Language. 2006. Vol. 54. P. 425-443.
14. Janhunen J. Mongolic languages // Brown, K. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language & linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2006. P. 231-234.
15. Jun S.-A., Bishop J. Priming Implicit Prosody: Prosodic Boundaries and Individual Differences // Language and Speech. 2015. Vol. 58, №4. P. 459-473. DOI:10.1177/0023830914563368
16. Mitchell D. C., Cuetos F., Corley M.M.B., Brysbaert M. Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (non-lexical) statistical records // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1995. Vol. 24, №6. P. 469-488.
17. Munkhtsetseg N. On the Mongolian Students` Difficulties in Acquiring English Relative Clauses, Due to Syntactic Structure Difference // At the Crossroads: Challenges of Foreign Language Learning. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Editors: Piechurska-Kuciel, Ewa, Szymańska-Czaplak, Elżbieta, Szyszka, Magdalena (Eds.). Springer International Publishing AG. 2017. P. 53-71. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55155-5_4
18. Swets B., Desmet T., Hamrick D.Z., Ferreira F. The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2007. Vol. 136, № 1. P. 64-81.
19. Traxler M.J. Working memory contributions to relative clause attachment processing: A hierarchical linear modeling analysis // Memory and Cognition. 2007. Vol. 35, №5. P. 1107-1121. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193482.
20. Yamada T., Arai M., Hirose Y. Unforced Revision in Processing Relative Clause Association Ambiguity in Japanese: Evidence Against Revision as Last Resort // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2017. Vol. 46, №3. P. 661-714. DOI 10.1007/s10936-016-9457-8
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Власов М.С., Павлов В.И., Ундармаа Д., Громогласова Т.И. ПРЕДПОЧТЕНИЕ ВЫСОКОГО ПРИСОЕДИНЕНИЯ АДЪЮНКТА ПРИ СЛОЖНОЙ ИМЕННОЙ ГРУППЕ В ПРОЦЕССЕ РАЗРЕШЕНИЯ СИНТАКСИЧЕСКОЙ НЕОДНОЗНАЧНОСТИ НОСИТЕЛЯМИ МОНГОЛЬСКОГО ЯЗЫКА. Вестник НГУ. Серия: Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2018;16(4):39-47. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2018-16-4-39-47
For citation:
Vlasov M.S., Pavlov V.I., Undarmaa D., Gromoglasova T.I. HIGH ATTACHMENT OF ADJUNCTS IN SENTENCES WITH COMPLEX NOUN PHRASES DURING SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION IN MONGOLIAN NATIVE SPEAKERS. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2018;16(4):39-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2018-16-4-39-47