Сause and Random Causation (on French Data)

This article addresses the semantic similarities and differences between causative constructions (CiveC) and causal constructions (CsalC) in French, with its findings probably relevant for typology studies as well. A contrastive syntactic and semantic analysis of the two construction types shows that while syntactically different, they are similar semantically in that both express cause vs. consequence relations. This similarity is not, however, complete. French has three types of CiveCs: factitive constructions with the auxiliary faire, permissives with the auxiliary laisser, and constructions with notional causative verbs. Causal constructions exist in two types – multiclause constructions, and nominal constructions. Revealing the ability of CiveCs and CsalCs to undergo mutual synonymic transformations, the article concludes that the similarities/differences of their grammatical meanings depend on the randomness/non-randomness of the causation (cause). Random causation takes place in agency situations with active agents. Non-random causation emerges where one event generates/impacts the other one. The conclusions are the following: 1) the factitive construction faire + Inf. can express two grammatical meanings: a) cause, b) random causation/active purposive action; 2) permissive constructions normally express random causation, except for constructions with inanimate subjects; 3) notional causative verbs can express both meanings above; 4) causal, both nominal and multiclause, constructions never express random causation, invariably signaling cause.

1. Boguslavskaya O. Yu., Levontina I. B. Smysly ‘prichina’ i ‘tsel’ v yestestvennomyazyke [Meaning of ‘cause’ and ‘purpose’ in natural language]. Voprosyyazykoznaniya. 2004. No. 2. Р. 68–88. URL: https://vja.ruslang.ru/ru/archive/2004-2/68-88 (accessed on 28.06.2023).

2. Geniušienė E. Aktantnyye sootvetstviya v konstruktsiyakh kauzativnykh oppozitsiy litovskogo yazyka [Argument correspondences in causative opposition constructions in Lithuanian]. In: Ve rus convictor, verus academicus. K 70-letiyu Nikolaya Nikolayevicha Kazanskogo [To the 70th birthday of N. N. Kazansky]. Р. 160–172. URL: https://nenadict.iling.spb.ru/publications/333 (accessed on 28.06.2023).

3. Zaika N. Polipredikativnyye prichinnyye konstruktsii v yazykakh mira: prostranstvo tipologicheskikh vozmozhnostey [Multiclausecausal constructions across languages: a space for typological possibilities] Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2004. No. 4, 2019. Р. 7–32. URL: https://vja.ruslang.ru/ru/archive/2019-4/7-32 (accessed on 28.06.2023).

4. Iordanskaya L., Mel’chuk I. K semantike russkikh prichinnykh predlogov (IZ*ZA lyubvi ~ OT lyubvi ~ IZ lyubvi ~ *S lyubvi ~ PO lyubvi) [On the meaning of Russian causal pronouns (IZ-ZA lyubvi ~ OT lyubvi ~ IZ lyubvi ~ *S lyubvi ~ Po lyubvi). In: Moskovskiy lingvisticheskiy zhurnal, 1996, 2. Р. 162–211. URL: http://mjl.rsuh.ru/issues/issue2.html (accessed on 28.06.2023).

5. Kordi E. Modalnye i kausativnye glagoly vo frantsuskom yazyke [Modal and causative verbs in French]. Spb., 1988.

6. Krylov S. Semanticheskaya kategoriya kauzalnosti (prichinnosti) i sposoby yeye vyrazheniya v russkom yazyke [The semantic category of causality and the means of its expression in Russian]. In: Prichinnyye konstruktsii v yazykakh mira (sinkhroniya, diakhroniya, tipologiya). Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii [Causal constructions in languages of the world (synchrony, diachrony, typology). Proceedings of an international conference]. Zaika N. M. (ed.). SPb.: ILI RAN, 2020. Р. 108–111. URL: https://nenadict.iling.spb.ru/publications/339 (accessed on 28.06.2023).

7. Nedjalkov V. P., Silnitsky G. G. Tipologiya kauzativnykh konstrukciy. In: Tipologiya kauzativnykh konstrukciy. Morfologičeskiy kauzativ [A Typology of Causative Constructions. Morphologic al Causative]. Kholodovich A. A. (ed.) Leningrad: Nauka, 1969. Р. 5–19. URL: https://iling.spb.ru/publications/1692 (accessed on 28.06.2023).

8. Nedjalkov V. P., Silnitsky G. G. Tipologiya morfologicheskogo i leksicheskogo kauzativov [A typology of morphological and lexical causatives]. In: Tipologiya kauzativnykh konstrukciy. Morfologicheskiyj kauzativ [Atypology of Causative Constructions. Morphological Causative]. Kholodovich A. A. (ed.) Leningrad: Nauka, 1969. Р. 20–50. URL: https://iling.spb.ru/publications/1692 (accessed on 28.06.2023).

9. Say S. Imennyye prichinnyye konstruktsii: parametry tipologicheskoy variativnosti i issledovatelskaya anketa [Nominal causal constructions: the parameters of typological variability and a tentative questionnaire]. In: Tipologiya prichinnykh konstruktsiy [A Typology of causal constructions]. Zaika N. M. (ed.). SPb.: ILI RAN, 2021 (manuscript). URL: https://www.academia.edu/42025922/Именные_причинные_конструкции_параметры_типологической_вариативности_и_исследовательская_анкета (accessed on 28.06.2023).

10. Kholodovich A. A. (ed.) Tipologiya kauzativnykh konstrukciy. Morfologicheskiy kauzativ. [A Typology of Causative Constructions. Morphological Causative]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1969.

11. Khrakovsky V. O sootnoshenii prichinnykh i kauzativnykh konstruktsiy [On correlation between causal and causative construction]. In: Uchenyye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Proceedings of the Petrozavodsk State University], 2020, 42(3). Р. 64–70. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-sootnoshenii-prichinnyh-i-kauzativnyh-konstruktsiy (accessed on 28.06.2023).

12. Khrakovsky V. Opyt sopostavitelnogo analiza prichinnykh i kauzativnykh konstruktsiy [A tentative contrastive analysis of causal and causative constructions]. In: Voprosy yazykoznaniya No. 5, 1921. Р. 7–25. URL: https://vja.ruslang.ru/ru/archive/2021-5/7-25 (accessed on 28.06.2023).

13. Comrie B., Polinsky M. (eds.). Causatives and transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1993.

14. Dixon R. M. W. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Dixon R. M. W., Aikhenvald A. Y. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000. Р. 30–83.

15. Gaatone D. Le jeu complexe de deux constructions causatives en français: quelques remarques // «La Grammaire de la Cause/ The Grammar of Causation»,Paris, 2324 octobre 2015. Р. 179–198. URL: https://lettres.sorbonne-universite.fr/sites/default/files/media/2020-05/la_grammaire_de_la_cause_actes.pdf (accessed on 28.06.2023)

16. Grevisse M., Goosse A. Le bon usage. Grammaire française. De Boeck & Larcier, Bruxelles, 2008.

17. Gross G. Prédicats de cause du premier et du second ordre// «La Grammaire de la Cause/ The Grammar of Causation», Paris, 23-24 octobre 2015. Р. 17–36. URL: https://lettres.sorbonneuniversite.fr/sites/default/files/media/2020-05/la_grammaire_de_la_cause_actes.pdf (accessed on 28.06.2023).

18. Israeli A. Russian causal prepositions: internal vs. External cause and impact // La grammaire de la cause / The grammar of causation. Actes du colloque international, Paris, 23–24 octobre 2015. Р. 205–222. URL: https://lettres.sorbonne-universite.fr/sites/default/files/media/2020-05/la_grammaire_de_la_cause_actes.pdf (accessed on 28.06.2023).

19. Viellard S., Thomières I. (eds.). Paris, 2015, 205–222. Mel’čuk 2015: Mel’čuk I. La causation dans la langue // La Grammaire de la Cause / The Grammar of Causation, Paris, 23–24 octobre 2015. Р. 7–16. URL: https://lettres.sorbonne-universite.fr/sites/default/files/media/2020-05/la_grammaire_de_la_cause_actes.pdf (accessed on 28.06.2023).

20. Moeschler J. Avec ou sans ? Une approche pragmatique des discours causaux explicités et implicités // La Grammaire de la Cause/ The Grammar of Causation, Paris, 23–24 octobre 2015. Р. 36–51. URL: https://lettres.sorbonne-universite.fr/sites/default/files/media/2020-05/la_grammaire_de_la_cause_actes.pdf (accessed on 28.06.2023).

21. Shibatani M. (ed.) The grammar of causative constructions. New York: Academic Press, 1976.

22. Shibatani M. (ed.). The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002.