Izafet as a Means of Expressing the Functional-Semantic Category of Measure in the Yakut Language

The current paper is the first to consider possessive (one-suffix) phrases in the functional-semantic aspect, designating spatial measures (level, distance, length, size, time, etc.) in Yakut. In the Yakut and Turkic linguistics, the study of the category of belonging, namely, isafet, has a long history. But possessive constructions based on the isafet have not been presented until now as a means of expressing the functional-semantic category of measure. The purpose of the article is to identify and analyse the structural and semantic features of possessive constructions expressing measure in the Yakut language. To achieve this goal, we considered the history of the study of possessive constructions in Turkic and Yakut linguistics and analyzed the structure and semantics of constructions to determine the carrier of quantitative semes in each construction. The object of the study is the determinative phrases (isafet) formed morphologically, namely with the help of the affix of the 3rd person singular -a (-e, -o, -o), -ta (-te, -to, -to). The main methods used in the study were systematization, analysis of syntactic units, morphemic description (glossing) of a lexical unit, descriptive method and semantic analysis to identify the functions of possessive constructions. As a result of the systematization in terms of functional grammar, three main groups have been identified: possessive constructions with special lexemes for measurement – classifiers, comparative postpositions saҕa, kurduk’, as if with the affix of the instrumental case -nan, also the affix of the dative case -ar, -gar. The classifier in the isafet is an indicator that allows us to more clearly express parametric data in the language. Phrases with postpositional-case components express intersubject relations “the subject and its part”, with the affix of the dative case – locative relations. With the help of functional and semantic studies of language or speech, we penetrate into the national system of language behavior, a specific worldview and thinking process of the people.

1. Betlingk O. N. About the Yakut language. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1989. 646 p.

2. Hegel. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl, 1974, 452 p. (in Russ.)

3. Grammar of the modern Yakut literary language. Phonetics and morphology. M.: Nauka, 1982. 195 p. (in Russ.)

4. Danilova N. I. Pronoun in the Yakut language. Yakutsk: YANTS SB RAS, 199. 120 p. (in Russ.)

5. Dmitriev N. K. Grammar of the Bashkir language. M., 1948. Рp. 224–228 (in Russ.).

6. Dubrovina M. E. On the stages of the formation of determinative substantive constructions (isaphetes) in the language of ancient Turkic runic inscriptions (in comparison with modern Turkish) // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. 2015. Episode 13. Issue 1. Рp. 12–21 (in Russ.).

7. Ivanova I. B., Noeva S. E. National cultural specificity of the concepts “center” and “periphery” in the Yakut language // Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Linguistics and intercultural communication. 2019. Vol. 17. No. 3. Рp. 120–129. DOI 10.25205/1818-7935-2019-17-3-120-129 (in Russ.)

8. Kononov A. N. Grammar of the modern Turkish language. L., 1934. Рp. 191–197. (in Russ.)

9. Maizel S. S. Izafet in the Turkish language / Ed., preface and note by A.N. Kononov; Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Institute of Oriental Studies. M. ; L.: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1957. 186 p. (in Russ.)

10. Mel A. A body part as a standard in measuring constructions of the Russian language. URL: https:// www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/87669/1/Moehl_Endfassung.pdf (in Russ.)

11. Pekarsky E. K. Dictionary of the Yakut language: [in 3 volumes] / E. K. Pekarsky. 2nd ed. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1959.Vol. 3, iss. 10–13, 2509–3858 stb.

12. Ubryatova E. I. Research on the syntax of the Yakut language. A simple sentence. M.-L.: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1950. 304 p. (in Russ.)

13. Filippov G. G. Predicative declension in the Yakut language. Yakutsk: Publishing house of YSU, 1996. 190 p. (in Russ.)

14. Chirkoeva D. I. The category of belonging in the modern Yakut language. Abstract ... academic degree of Candidate of Philology N. Yakutsk, 1998. 24 p. (in Russ.)

15. Chirkoeva D. I., Filippov G. G. Analysis of possessive phrases expressing belonging in the socalled Russian and Yakut languages // Vestnik SVFU. 2018. No. 1 (63). Рp. 123–132. (in Russ.)

16. Baker, M., Vinokurova, N. Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha // Natural language and linguistic theory. 2010. No. 28 (3). Pp. 593–642.

17. Croft, W. Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory from a typological perspective. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2011.

18. Danilova, N., Vinokurova, N. Two different approaches to Sakha passives. Altay Hakpo, 2015. Vol. 25. Рp. 117–131.

19. Fillmore, Ch. J., Kay, P., O’Connor, M. C. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of “let alone”. Language, 1988. Vol. 64, no. 3. Рp. 501–538.

20. Goldberg, A. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Grammar. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2006.

21. Tomasello, M. Constructing a language: A Usage-Based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge (MA). Harvard Univ. Press, 2003.