Direct Object Acquisition in the Speech of Adult L2 Russian Learners
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2025-23-2-130-144
Abstract
This article investigates direct object acquisition by adult learners of Russian as a second language (L2). Students of different proficiency levels (A1-C1) took part in the experimental study and their data was compared with that produced by the L1 speakers. It found that verb valency, as well as learner proficiency levels, significantly impact this process. Verbs with 5–6 object types demonstrate more differences between L1 and L2 groups than verbs with 3–4 object types, indicating a link between verb valency and acquisition difficulty. Object types used by low proficiency level speakers turned out not to be always the most common or frequent in standard Russian, as the most common types do not equal the simplest ones. The distribution of direct object types was only partly affected by the proficiency level. L2 learners of almost any level appeared to be familiar with different direct object types. It claims that non-accusative, peripheral object types, like infinitives, do not depend on the language proficiency level, regardless of their frequency.
About the Authors
K. K. Kashleva
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kseniia K. Kashleva, Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor
Moscow
S. V. Krasnoshchekova
Institute for Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sofia V. Krasnoshchekova, Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Researcher
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Artoni D., Magnani M. Acquiring case marking in Russian as a second language. An exploratory study on subject and object. Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory. EUROSLA Monograph Series, 2015, pp. 177–193.
2. Bar-Shalom E., Snyder W. Optional Infinitives in Russian and Their Implications for the Pro-Drop Debate. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Indiana Meeting, 1996.
3. Brač I., Magić S. D. The role of verb valency in Croatian and Russian learning at B1 level. J-FLTAL, 2014, p. 111.
4. Cherepovskaia N., Slioussar N., Denissenko A. Acquisition of the nominal case system in Russian as a second language. Second Language Research, 2021, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 555–580.
5. De Lisser T. N., Durrleman S., Rizzi L., Shlonsky U. Root infinitives in Jamaican Creole. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2021, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5705
6. Dragoy O., Bastiaanse R. Verb production and word order in Russian agrammatic speakers. Aphasiology, 2010, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 28–55.
7. Gagarina N. The early verb development and demarcation of stages in three Russian-speaking children. In: D. Bittner, W. Dressler, M. Kilani-Schoch (Eds.). Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2003, pp. 131–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899832.131
8. Haspelmath M. Ditransitive Constructions: The Verb ‘Give’. In: Dryer M. S., Haspelmath M. (Eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2013. Available at: http://wals.info/chapter/105 (accessed: 22.07.2022).
9. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., 2020.
10. Janssen B., Meir N. Production, comprehension and repetition of accusative case by monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian-Dutch and Russian-Hebrew-speaking children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4–5, pp. 736–765.
11. Kempe V., MacWhinney B. The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1998, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 543–587. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263198004045
12. Kempe V., MacWhinney B. Processing of Morphological and Semantic Cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1999, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 129–171. DOI: 10.1080/016909699386329
13. Ladinskaya N., Chrabaszcz A., Lopukhina A. Acquisition of Russian Nominal Case Inflections by Monolingual Children: A Psycholinguistic Approach. Higher School of Economics Research Paper, 2019, no. WP BRP 81/LNG/2019
14. Ljashevskaja O. N., Sharov S. A. Chastotnyj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazyka (na materialah Nacional’nogo korpusa russkogo jazyka). Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2009.
15. Letuchij A. B. Perehodnost’. In: Materialy k Korpusnoj grammatike russkogo jazyka. Glagol. Chast’ I. Saint-Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija, 2016, pp. 213–267.
16. Laufer B., Waldman T. Verb-Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English. Language Learning, 2011, vol. 61, pp. 647–672.
17. Montrul S. Causatives and Transitivity in L2 English. Language Learning, 2001, vol. 51, pp. 51– 106. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00148
18. Müller S. Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. Second revised and extended edition. Textbooks in Language Sciences 1. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2018.
19. Nuss S. Morphology acquisition research meets instruction of L2 Russian: A contextualized literature review. In: Morphology acquisition research meets instruction of L2 Russian, 2022, pp. 15–35.
20. Peirce G. Representational and Processing Constraints on the Acquisition of Case and Gender by Heritage and L2 Learners of Russian: A Corpus Study. Heritage Language Journal, 2018, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 95–115. DOI: 10.46538/hlj.15.1.5
21. Selinker L. INTERLANGUAGE. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1972, vol. 10, no. 1–4, pp. 209–232. DOI: 10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
22. Siewierska A. Alignment of Verbal Person Marking. In: Dryer M. S., Haspelmath M. (Eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2013. Available at: https://wals.info/chapter/100 (accessed: 15.09.2023)
23. Taraban R., Kempe V. Gender processing in native and nonnative Russian speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1999, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 119–148. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716499001046
24. The Russian National Corpus (ruscorpora.ru). 2003–2022. URL: https://ruscorpora.ru/en/
25. Tkachenko E., Chernigovskaya T. Input frequencies in processing of verbal morphology in L1 and L2: Evidence from Russian. In: Russian in contrast: Lexicon. Oslo Studies in Language, 2010, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 281–318.
26. Wakabayashi S. A principle of economy in derivation in L2 grammar: Do everything in narrow syntax. Second Language Research, 2021, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 521–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319879969
27. Zhao Q., Jiang J. Verb valency in interlanguage: An extension to valency theory and new perspective on L2 learning. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 2020, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 339–363.
Review
For citations:
Kashleva K.K., Krasnoshchekova S.V. Direct Object Acquisition in the Speech of Adult L2 Russian Learners. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2025;23(2):130-144. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2025-23-2-130-144
Views:
157
JATS XML
Email this article 