Mixed Martial Arts Discourse from the Perspective of its Entertaining Nature and Figurativeness
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-4-146-159
Abstract
The article dwells on mixed martial arts discourse which is interpreted as a type of martial discourse dealing with sports communication and having an entertaining quality, thus allowing us to speak of a hybrid discourse. The methodology of this research includes descriptive and analytical methods. The linguostylistic and contextual types of analysis alongside with the quantitative method have been applied. The most common key concepts related to interactive communication have been singled out: ‘game’, ‘fun’, ‘show’, ‘entertainment’, ‘performance’, ‘pleasure’, etc. All of them play an important role in mixed martial arts discourse and manifest themselves in its lexis. We have also found that one of the most important tropes used in sports communication is the metaphor. In mixed martial arts discourse, many metaphorical models are actualized. The main one is the military metaphor. This is accounted for by profound kinship between mixed martial arts, the battle, the fight and the war. In our material, a zoomorphic metaphor is the second most frequent one. Reference to the animal world is underpinned by drawing a parallel between animal and human aggression. A professional mixed martial artist has to be dangerous and belligerent. Hence, the metaphorical likening of them to the hunter and to some extent to someone disturbing public order or even breaking the law, that is what our analysis shows. It was also found that a mixed martial arts champion is often portrayed as the king (or the queen as the case may be).
About the Author
A. B. Alexeyev
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander B. Alexeyev, Candidate of Philology
Moscow
References
1. Bulgakova, A. A. Creating a new world: transmedia storytelling principles in the covid-19 pandemic news discourse. Actual Issues of Modern Philology and Journalism, 2021, no. 3(42), pp. 82–90. (in Russ.)
2. Golovanova, E. I. Professional discourse, subdiscourse, genre of professional communication: correlation of terms. Vestnik of Cheliabinsk University, 2013, no. 1(292), pp. 32–35. (in Russ.)
3. Issers, O. S. Discourse practices of our time. Moscow, LENAND, 2015, 272 p. (in Russ.)
4. Kondakova, E. A., Printsipalova, O. V. Discourse on the Linguistic Implementation of the principles of Political Correctness in German Political Linguistics. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2021, no. 2, pp. 143–156. (in Russ.)
5. Kopnina, G. A. Verbal Resistance to Political Labelling as a Defensive Means in Information- Psychological War. Philological Sciences. The Questions of Theory and Practice, 2020, vol. 13, iss. 11, pp. 248–253. (in Russ.)
6. Mal’tseva, I. A. About the Peculiarities of Speech Interaction in Modern Media Discourse. Vestnik of Chuvash state pedagogical university, 2022, no. 1(114), pp. 78–83. (in Russ.)
7. Mal’tseva, I. A., Lebedinskaya, V. G. Development of Esports Journalism in the Context of Formation of Sports Discourse: Experience of Analyzing the Media Text of the Regional Online Publication “Yuga.ru”. Vestnik of Chuvash state pedagogical university. 2022, no. 1(114), pp. 84–90. (in Russ.)
8. Nigmatulina, V. N., Galichkina E. N. Image characteristics of concept ‘cybercriminality’ (at the example of Russian and English online mass-media). Creative linguistics, 2020, pp. 90–95. (in Russ.)
9. Sebruyuk, A. N. Discrimination and Linguistic appropriation as the examples of double consciousness in the U.S. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2019. no. 1, pp. 134–148. (in Russ.)
10. Styrina, E. V., Martirosyan, A. A. Elements of fictionality in media texts: facts vs fiction. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2021, no. 1, pp. 92–105. (in Russ.)
11. Fefelov A.F. The Discourse around Cancel Culture as an Object of Linguocultural and Translation Analysis: Logic vs “Logic”. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2022, no. 1, pp. 126–144. (in Russ.)
12. Shmeleva, E. S. Cognitive Mechanisms and Pragmatic Potential of Linguistic Creativity (As Exemplified in The Economist). Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2020, no. 3, pp. 78–86. (in Russ.)
13. Bourdieu, P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977, 240 p.
14. Boyd, M. Participation and recontextualization in new media. Political discourse analysis and You Tube. From text to political positions: text analysis across disciplines. Ed. by M. B. Kaal, I. Maks & A. van Elfrinkhof. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2014, pp. 245–268.
15. Curzan, A. Fixing English. Prescriptivism and language history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 197 p.
16. Janich, N. Handbuch Werbekommunikation. Sprachwissenschaftliche und interdisziplinäre Zugänge. Darmstadt: Francke Verlag, 2012, 508 S.
17. Kujawa, I. Der politische Diskurs als Gegenstand der linguistischen Analyse am Beispiel der Integrationsdebatte in Deutschland 2006–2010. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang Edition, 2014, 234 S.
18. Mills, S. Discourse. London, Routledge, 2004, 168 p.
19. Paveau, M. Les prédiscurs. Sens, mémoire, cognition. Paris, Presses Sorbonne no.uvelle, 2006, 256 p.
20. Smith, C. Modes of discourse. The local structure of texts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, 320 p.
21. Invicta FC: Phoenix Tournament: Atomweights | FULL EVENT [Online]. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLsClmsuhUo (accessed on 22.10.2022)
22. ONE: BAD BLOOD | Full Event [Online]. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lhj9Ybkuds (accessed on 22.10.2022)
Review
For citations:
Alexeyev A.B. Mixed Martial Arts Discourse from the Perspective of its Entertaining Nature and Figurativeness. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2022;20(4):146-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-4-146-159
Views:
191
Email this article 